Froch V Groves on TV

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Froch V Groves on TV

Post by andrewmarkhall on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 9:17 am

Hi guys,

Do any of you know if Froch v Groves will be on Sky, Boxnation or PPV?

Thanks in Advanced

Andy

andrewmarkhall

Posts: 18
Join date: 2011-10-14

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by mobilemaster8 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 9:19 am

Errrrr im presuming its on Sky mate as its Eddie Hearn.

Cant see it being PPV as its Groves who isn't PPV worthy yet.

mobilemaster8

Posts: 2779
Join date: 2012-05-10

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by bhb001 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 9:26 am

http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/latest/news/carl-froch-george-groves-will-be-on-sky-sports-box-office
 
This suggests it's on Sky Box Office. So PPV?

And this confirms it

http://www1.skysports.com/watch/boxing-on-sky


Last edited by bhb001 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 9:28 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : More information)

bhb001

Posts: 2593
Join date: 2011-02-16

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Rowley on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 9:38 am

Is on PPV, is all part of Eddie's plan to rip every boxing fan in Britain off and single handedly destroy boxing. (Saves you the hassle Strongy)

Rowley
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 14771
Join date: 2011-02-17
Age: 41

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by andrewmarkhall on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:03 am

Its a bit much really considering there is only two fights on the undercard.

andrewmarkhall

Posts: 18
Join date: 2011-10-14

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:08 am

Hearn said the only way this fight could be made was if it was PPV......even though he made Froch vs Bute which was on Sky Sports 1. That fight surely would have been more worthy of PPV than Froch vs Groves.

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn
V2 Journal
V2 Journal

Posts: 3971
Join date: 2011-02-01
Location: Costa Del Belfast

http://theboxingfreak.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by hogey on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:08 am

I am looking forward to the fight but will be finding an alternative method of viewing. The PPVs are getting to common again and it will take people not buying as before for Sky to reverse the policy yet again.

hogey

Posts: 1066
Join date: 2011-02-24
Location: London

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Rodney on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:09 am

If Sky can secure the Pacquiao v Rios fight as part of this PPV , you'll find that will dampen the dissatisfaction (that includes me )

Cheers Rodders

Rodney

Posts: 1319
Join date: 2011-02-15
Age: 35
Location: Thirsk

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Strongback on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:11 am

Rowley wrote:Is on PPV, is all part of Eddie's plan to rip every boxing fan in Britain off and single handedly destroy boxing. (Saves you the hassle Strongy)
Rumours are HBO are passing on this fight.


Just to clarify my beliefs and to avoid any misrepresentation, I see it that the Hearn's are trying to monopolize British boxing in a similar way they have done with darts and snooker. Looks like the BBBofC are thankfully starting to kick back at Matchrooms arrogance and self belief that they can steam roll British boxing.

With each passing day and another balls up by Eddie he is starting to lose the glamour and take on the aura of what a casual boxing fan friend of mine said to me a few months ago "Who this Eddie guy? he's like a used car salesman. He's doing a poor imitation of his father."

Strongback

Posts: 4322
Join date: 2011-07-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Rowley on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:16 am

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:Hearn said the only way this fight could be made was if it was PPV......even though he made Froch vs Bute which was on Sky Sports 1. That fight surely would have been more worthy of PPV than Froch vs Groves.
It also kicked off at 2 in the morning. Which is hardly ideal for either the TV viewers or those in attendance.

Rowley
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 14771
Join date: 2011-02-17
Age: 41

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:28 am

Froch vs Bute kicked off at 10pm from what I remember

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn
V2 Journal
V2 Journal

Posts: 3971
Join date: 2011-02-01
Location: Costa Del Belfast

http://theboxingfreak.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Strongback on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:29 am

The Froch v Groves fight is being shown free in the US on the TV channel Awe TV.

Another coup for Fast Car Eddie.

Froch may be a little sore about this given his "International Superstar" status.


Strongback

Posts: 4322
Join date: 2011-07-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:30 am

The KO coming at 12.37am

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn
V2 Journal
V2 Journal

Posts: 3971
Join date: 2011-02-01
Location: Costa Del Belfast

http://theboxingfreak.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:34 am

Has to be PPV.............Froch is used to big money and Hearn has got it into his head Froch is a huge attraction and PPv worthy despite being a distant second in his weight class.....

The same Hearn who was almost apologetic at sticking Froch-Kessler on PPV because of the purses of the fighters and who is no doubt like all good promoters stealing an inch to take a mile......

Froch-Kessler was just a water testing exercise..Never believed that b*****cks

Anything decent will be PPv from now on...........As I stated at the time of Froch-Kessler..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by milkyboy on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:39 am

Harsh strongy. It is called awe tv... Whereelse would a massive international superstar warrior ply his trade than on a channel called 'awe'

My bad just realised its actually 'oar' tv, a rowing channel. Hey, any port in a storm.

milkyboy

Posts: 3150
Join date: 2011-05-22

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Strongback on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:43 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Has to be PPV.............Froch is used to big money and Hearn has got it into his head Froch is a huge attraction and PPv worthy despite being a distant second in his weight class.....

The same Hearn who was almost apologetic at sticking Froch-Kessler on PPV because of the purses of the fighters and who is no doubt like all good promoters stealing an inch to take a mile......

Froch-Kessler was just a water testing exercise..Never believed that b*****cks

Anything decent will be PPv from now on...........As I stated at the time of Froch-Kessler..


At least HBO see this fight as a dud and are not showing it even though Froch has a four fight deal with HBO.

Strongback

Posts: 4322
Join date: 2011-07-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:46 am

HBO sees the Klits as a dud.........

You probably like them..they aren't English........

You hated Boxnation till Frampton went there.......Now you big them up all the time..........

Quigg, Matthews, Haye, Hatton, Brook are all useless............

We get it..........

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Rowley on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:54 am

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:The KO coming at 12.37am
Will take your word for it Reborn, thought it was later than that but had gone to bed so can't be certain.

Rowley
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 14771
Join date: 2011-02-17
Age: 41

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:56 am

Nah mate, I checked the BBC's "Froch vs Bute as it happened" page. gives the exact timings.

I had to check as when you said it was 2am I thought "I watched this live and would NEVER sit up that late to watch Froch fight". So it must have been earlier.

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn
V2 Journal
V2 Journal

Posts: 3971
Join date: 2011-02-01
Location: Costa Del Belfast

http://theboxingfreak.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Rowley on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 10:59 am

Gutted now mate. I was away for the weekend and was in a pub to watch it but sacked it off when Sky said he was not due in the ring until around 1am as I had to be up early in the morning. Would have toughed it out if I realised it was going to be that early.

Rowley
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 14771
Join date: 2011-02-17
Age: 41

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by mobilemaster8 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:01 am

Groves is NOT PPV quality and has not even proven himself worthy of that at all.

This is a complete Joke.

Alternative method lined up instead.

mobilemaster8

Posts: 2779
Join date: 2012-05-10

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Strongback on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:02 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:HBO sees the Klits as a dud.........

You probably like them..they aren't English........

You hated Boxnation till Frampton went there.......Now you big them up all the time..........

Quigg, Matthews, Haye, Hatton, Brook are all useless............

We get it..........
If you're going to have a pop at least get your facts right.

Derry has signed for Warren. 5 fight deal. You're better at ignoring the abuse of women than me.

What has Hatton got to do with this, he hasn't been a player for yonks.

My work with Haye is done. Practically everybody now sees him for what he is. I was just one of the people to spot it going back to before the first cancelled fight with Wlad.

Brook seems to have been the No.1 contender for some belt or other for the last 5 years yet he's still faffing about.


Quigg I see as a good prospect one of the best in the UK. Similar level to Frampton.


For the record my personal view is that Frank is pretty odious but in saying that the metaphorical sewer he inhabits is the same place that the Hearns sleep and do their business. These guys grew up poor kids within a stones throw of each other and fought their way out using the same tactics. Barry is smoother and has better at PR but he is essentially the same animal as Warren.








Strongback

Posts: 4322
Join date: 2011-07-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:04 am

But some fighters are deemed worthy of PPV status...........

and it's them that sell the fight apparently........

Because the sporting fan is completely ignorant about Boxing.......They think Froch is a superstar.......Not the 2nd best fighter in the "recent" jr light heavyweight division..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:07 am

Strongback wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:HBO sees the Klits as a dud.........

You probably like them..they aren't English........

You hated Boxnation till Frampton went there.......Now you big them up all the time..........

Quigg, Matthews, Haye, Hatton, Brook are all useless............

We get it..........
If you're going to have a pop at least get your facts right.

Derry has signed for Warren. 5 fight deal.  You're better at ignoring the abuse of women than me.

What has Hatton got to do with this, he hasn't been a player for yonks.

My work with Haye is done. Practically everybody now sees him for what he is.  I was just one of the people to spot it going back to before the first cancelled fight with Wlad.

Brook seems to have been the No.1 contender for some belt or other for the last 5 years yet he's still faffing about.


Quigg I see as a good prospect one of the best in the UK.  Similar level to Frampton.


For the record my personal view is that Frank is pretty odious but in saying that the metaphorical sewer he inhabits is the same place that the Hearns sleep and do their business.  These guys grew up poor kids within a stones throw of each other and fought their way out using the same tactics. Barry is smoother and has better at PR but he is essentially the same animal as Warren.







I don't want to check facts with you......because you are a nut that isn't worth it.......It was a summary.............

Now sling it.........You're more crazy than d4.........and that's a fact I checked it on BOXREC.

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Strongback on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:11 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
Strongback wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:HBO sees the Klits as a dud.........

You probably like them..they aren't English........

You hated Boxnation till Frampton went there.......Now you big them up all the time..........

Quigg, Matthews, Haye, Hatton, Brook are all useless............

We get it..........
If you're going to have a pop at least get your facts right.

Derry has signed for Warren. 5 fight deal.  You're better at ignoring the abuse of women than me.

What has Hatton got to do with this, he hasn't been a player for yonks.

My work with Haye is done. Practically everybody now sees him for what he is.  I was just one of the people to spot it going back to before the first cancelled fight with Wlad.

Brook seems to have been the No.1 contender for some belt or other for the last 5 years yet he's still faffing about.


Quigg I see as a good prospect one of the best in the UK.  Similar level to Frampton.


For the record my personal view is that Frank is pretty odious but in saying that the metaphorical sewer he inhabits is the same place that the Hearns sleep and do their business.  These guys grew up poor kids within a stones throw of each other and fought their way out using the same tactics. Barry is smoother and has better at PR but he is essentially the same animal as Warren.







I don't want to check facts with you......because you are a nut that isn't worth it.......It was a summary.............

Now sling it.........You're more crazy than d4.........and that's a fact I checked it on BOXREC.


As usual when you get caught telling lies you put a box over your head and start shouting.

Strongback

Posts: 4322
Join date: 2011-07-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:13 am

Funny how this guy calls me a liar......Another reason he's a nut.......

Look you really do bore me Mate........Honestly you do.......

Call me a liar.......I don't care..........

and If you've never written an article about Boxnation like you've claimed..then I won't tell anybody to check your history.......Because you're not worth it.

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Strongback on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:27 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Funny how this guy calls me a liar......Another reason he's a nut.......

Look you really do bore me Mate........Honestly you do.......

Call me a liar.......I don't care..........

and If you've never written an article about Boxnation like you've claimed..then I won't tell anybody to check your history.......Because you're not worth it.

Pushing you around is like what Big Daddy said "Easy,Easy, Easy, Easy.............".

Strongback

Posts: 4322
Join date: 2011-07-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:28 am

Let's just leave it......................................

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Lumbering_Jack on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:28 am

You could cut the sexual tension on here with a knife.

Lumbering_Jack

Posts: 4358
Join date: 2011-03-07
Location: Newcastle

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:29 am

Lumbering_Jack wrote:You could cut the sexual tension on here with a knife.
When I saw your name I figured it wouldn't be thread related..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Lumbering_Jack on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:30 am

Irony

Lumbering_Jack

Posts: 4358
Join date: 2011-03-07
Location: Newcastle

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:32 am

Do me a favor........Keep leaving one line non-thread related guff around.......

Have a feeling 606 may receive an early christmas present..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Lumbering_Jack on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:33 am

Bit hormonal today Truss.

Did the wife forget to pack your lunch?

Lumbering_Jack

Posts: 4358
Join date: 2011-03-07
Location: Newcastle

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by milkyboy on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:36 am

Don't think his wife has been near his lunchpack for a while... Would make any man a little tetchy.

milkyboy

Posts: 3150
Join date: 2011-05-22

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:37 am

Not when you have a Peter North collection.....

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:38 am

Oooooh, my "owning" sense is tingling.....Truss being ripped apart by 3 members!!!

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn
V2 Journal
V2 Journal

Posts: 3971
Join date: 2011-02-01
Location: Costa Del Belfast

http://theboxingfreak.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Hammersmith harrier on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:39 am

The only true measure of whether it's PPV worthy is how much it sells, considering it involves two British fighters I think it will do quite well. I would prefer it to be on standard sky sports but Hearn has to pay them somehow and this is the most sensible way.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts: 3070
Join date: 2013-09-26

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:40 am

Hammersmith harrier wrote:The only true measure of whether it's PPV worthy is how much it sells, considering it involves two British fighters I think it will do quite well. I would prefer it to be on standard sky sports but Hearn has to pay them somehow and this is the most sensible way.
I'll ignore the idiot....

Think it will sell too Hammer.........Groves should be a competitive fight..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Hammersmith harrier on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:42 am

Both are big names in British boxing so I can't see it flopping.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts: 3070
Join date: 2013-09-26

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Strongback on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:43 am

Talking of Peter North apparently Broner has made a tape of himself having a threesome which is going viral at the moment.

Strongback

Posts: 4322
Join date: 2011-07-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:43 am

I agree.........Groves is quite an appealling chappie with an unbeaten record and a good win over Degale........

Froch has already shown he's a PPV sell.......

and it's Froch that is selling the fight..anyway

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:45 am

Strongback wrote:Talking of Peter North apparently Broner has made a tape of himself having a threesome which is going viral at the moment.
Have to admit It wouldn't be the end of the world If Broner walked onto a big right...........Though it's nice to have characters in the sport.

He reminds of these knobheads like Kanye west............

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:46 am

Strongback wrote:Talking of Peter North apparently Broner has made a tape of himself having a threesome which is going viral at the moment.
Its on Worldstarhiphop. I seen the vid posted but didn't watch it as its bad enough seeing him with clothes on rather than off.

The funny thing is apparantly he has to pay for sex off this women because he is dog ugly

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn
V2 Journal
V2 Journal

Posts: 3971
Join date: 2011-02-01
Location: Costa Del Belfast

http://theboxingfreak.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TopHat24/7 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:48 am

Strongback wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:HBO sees the Klits as a dud.........

You probably like them..they aren't English........

You hated Boxnation till Frampton went there.......Now you big them up all the time..........

Quigg, Matthews, Haye, Hatton, Brook are all useless............

We get it..........
If you're going to have a pop at least get your facts right.

Derry has signed for Warren. 5 fight deal.  You're better at ignoring the abuse of women than me.

What has Hatton got to do with this, he hasn't been a player for yonks.

My work with Haye is done. Practically everybody now sees him for what he is.  I was just one of the people to spot it going back to before the first cancelled fight with Wlad.

Brook seems to have been the No.1 contender for some belt or other for the last 5 years yet he's still faffing about.


Quigg I see as a good prospect one of the best in the UK.  Similar level to Frampton.


For the record my personal view is that Frank is pretty odious but in saying that the metaphorical sewer he inhabits is the same place that the Hearns sleep and do their business.  These guys grew up poor kids within a stones throw of each other and fought their way out using the same tactics. Barry is smoother and has better at PR but he is essentially the same animal as Warren.


How many companies have the Hearns' collapsed in order to avoid paying their fighters?

Because Frank has just done it again I believe. Quite why any boxer would go with him I've no idea - when you're job involves trying to stop another guy rendering you unconscious the most important thing I'd look for is realistic guarantee of getting paid!!

TopHat24/7

Posts: 11689
Join date: 2011-07-01
Age: 30
Location: London

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TopHat24/7 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:49 am

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:
Strongback wrote:Talking of Peter North apparently Broner has made a tape of himself having a threesome which is going viral at the moment.
Its on Worldstarhiphop. I seen the vid posted but didn't watch it as its bad enough seeing him with clothes on rather than off.

The funny thing is apparantly he has to pay for sex off this women because he is dog ugly
Hahaha, you see the 'weekend pu$$y' presser with Paulie?? Amazing stuff, cracked up Laugh

TopHat24/7

Posts: 11689
Join date: 2011-07-01
Age: 30
Location: London

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:51 am

Kind of funny as soon as I argue with one poster.....I get the whole board chiming in......

Should be a compliment..but it's more of an irritation...........

Time some people learned to behave round here..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Strongback on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:55 am

Apparently Broner was tweeting about proposing to his girlfriend at the same time the video comes out of him with the hookers.

Strongback

Posts: 4322
Join date: 2011-07-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:57 am

The guy has no class.............When his career goes jubblies up he'll realise just how many real friends he's got.

TRUSSMAN66

Posts: 23252
Join date: 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Rowley on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:57 am

Broner is like Mayweather without the charm. Something I would have not believed possible were it not for him.

Rowley
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 14771
Join date: 2011-02-17
Age: 41

Back to top Go down

Re: Froch V Groves on TV

Post by Rodney on Tue 29 Oct 2013, 11:59 am

Makes Mayweather look like an angel.

Don't think I've encountered a more dislikable character in recent years , a new breed of tools arriving.

Cheers Rodders

Rodney

Posts: 1319
Join date: 2011-02-15
Age: 35
Location: Thirsk

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum