The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Most perfectly rated current international player.

+25
jbeadlesbigrighthand
Rory_Gallagher
dummy_half
BamBam
Cyril
R!skysports
Bind up
ebop
funnyExiledScot
beshocked
Gooseberry
Gwlad
bsando
thebandwagonsociety
king_carlos
Maine man
GunsGermsV2
rodders
Geordie
Mad for Chelsea
lostinwales
RuggerRadge2611
SecretFly
No 7&1/2
wolfball
29 posters

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

Go down

Most perfectly rated current international player. - Page 3 Empty Most perfectly rated current international player.

Post by wolfball Thu 01 Dec 2016, 3:39 pm

First topic message reminder :

So, most players are under rated or over rated and that debate usually depends what country the fan and player is from. I am more fascinated by players that everyone regards as well rated by anyone. Now that rating might be low (every fan knows he is terrible) or might be high (every fan knows he's the best in the world (Mccaw at peak)) but which players would you say are currently perfectly rated?

I think heaslip is an example of a current perfectly rated player, with few if any over rating him, and after his great 2016 few underrating him...

wolfball

Posts : 975
Join date : 2011-08-18
Age : 40

Back to top Go down


Most perfectly rated current international player. - Page 3 Empty Re: Most perfectly rated current international player.

Post by ChequeredJersey Tue 06 Dec 2016, 1:56 am

miaow wrote:
Poorfour wrote:Well, you're entitled to your opinion but the numbers say something quite different.

And statistics are only as good as the context they are in. You can prove anything with statistics.

How do you quantify the "post-RWC rebuilding" effect? How do you quantify the impact of the "right" new coach for a short term success on a group of dejected but competent players?

You can't just dismiss opinion- subjective context- as redundant, as somehow a lesser guage than the figures. Take England v Australia fixtures in the last 12 months: the Australia team that demolished England in the RWC was one firing at its best. The team that England beat 3-0 in the Summer was way off that level, and despite the impressive feat of winning three away from home, should be considered within that context. The Australia team that England beat last weekend had improved, but equally, it all has to be taken within context.

With that in mind, I'm happy to say that England are just about the best team in Europe. But forget the statistics if you're not willing to widen your scope and consider something more than just the rankings. Take statistics from the previous few seasons. Take a longer term view: a team isn't just created in twelve months, and if it is, you have to ask how/why has it improved so dramatically, and can it last?

Eddie Jones is not Joe Schmidt. He's not even Gatland. The bubble will burst. It doesn't mean you'll become significantly worse, merely than the 'bubble'- all the hype and expectation that is being bestowed on the team- will be tempered by a couple of losses. You cannot continue an upward trajectory like England have experienced since the World Cup, there will be a levelling off. In the short term, that bubble- that confidence- is undoubtedly helping you. It's psychological. But when you lose a few games as it becomes harder to give novel tactics to the players, as the other teams progress in their rebuilding process, you may well find that- just as Lancaster experienced- the external hype that once added a drive to your standards becomes suffocating, and hinders you.

It's when you get the media chirping up comparing the team to the 2003 RWC winners. When, having won one 6Ns, you have pundits declaring that England could go on and dominate European rugby for years to come. I'm not sure if this is a new thing, or whether it's some latent release of all the disappointment you suffered during the comedown post-'03, but no other nation- not even Wales- has the same levels of (let's call it) 'confidence' when they start winning. Whereas other nations seem to be better at compartmentalising the fanatics, the media tends to give validity to English exceptionalism.

In my opinion, even considering the statistics, going on what this topic is based on- perception of a rugby player/team- I believe England are overrated, yes. The sheer noise the team is now garnering in papers like The Times and The Mail should be a good signifier of that, the heartlands of casual and aspirational English rugby fans getting whipped up to start caring about their rugby team again now that they're winning.

You're good. I'm impressed that you've managed to win every game this calendar year. That's an impressive feat. However, since perhaps 08/09 there has been very little between England, Ireland, and Wales. There have been dips in form for all three sides of course during this period, but generally speaking, the talent, ability, and level of performance from all three teams has been largely similar. Each team has their own strengths and weaknesses, which makes it even more interesting, and part of the reason why it seems that they have hit their 'peaks' at different times. Even now, as England have the conditions conducive to success, I don't believe it has a longevity to it, that Eddie Jones has somehow found a secret forumal to get England playing (self belief and a solid and agressive pack!?). The Aviva Premiership is as much to thank for England's success as Eddie Jones, I believe. The standards have improved so dramatically in the last 2-3 years due to the influx of top talent that that has only driven the English players to improve, in order to just survive at club level. You may well win the 6Ns this year. If you did the GS, that would set you up to most likely break the All Blacks' winning streak, which would be emphatic. Even then, context is required: the All Blacks started that run before a RWC, and played the SH teams regularly. England won't have played the All Blacks if/when they do break that record.

In any case, I still don't see a significant difference between Ireland and England, even if Wales have slipped somewhat, and need to have a jumpstart rebuild having opted not to do so this time last year. Ireland's RWC was similarly disappointing, exiting early, and I think Schmidt's rejuvination of his team if frankly more impressive than Jones' of England. But there we go. It's all a matter of opinion, after all.

Would English fans be so quick to defend their team, and evoke statistics, if they were as comfortable that the success will last as they seem to attest to? I think it's probably more a matter of misunderstanding. English fans want to consider the wins as definitive markers of their ability: I'm looking at those games within context (nearly bottled it against France and Wales, poor Australian side in the Summer, rebuilding etc.) as well as what I think is coming in the near and medium term future. I don't believe Eddie Jones is setting you up for World Cup glory, which much of the media is tentatively starting to suggest/think about. That's what I mean by overrated, not that the winning streak in and of itself wasn't impressive. It's a fine line to tread, trying to be fair but critical of England and not come across as bitter.


Some would say that Jones has achieved more than either Gatland or Schmidt in terms of their career, especially the context of their achievements
ChequeredJersey
ChequeredJersey

Posts : 18707
Join date : 2011-12-23
Age : 34
Location : London, UK

Back to top Go down

Most perfectly rated current international player. - Page 3 Empty Re: Most perfectly rated current international player.

Post by ChequeredJersey Tue 06 Dec 2016, 1:57 am

In fact, I take that back. There's no argument at all. He has.
ChequeredJersey
ChequeredJersey

Posts : 18707
Join date : 2011-12-23
Age : 34
Location : London, UK

Back to top Go down

Most perfectly rated current international player. - Page 3 Empty Re: Most perfectly rated current international player.

Post by Poorfour Tue 06 Dec 2016, 9:02 am

So much to disagree with, so little time...

For one thing, we actually do need to discount (note: discount does not equal dismiss) subjective opinion, because if we don't we end up in endless beshocked-style "it is because I say it is" type arguments.

And yes, context is important. That's why I looked at every game that top 10 nations had played against each other in 2016: because our best yardstick is looking at how teams do against each other and the same opposition. I even discounted England vs Fiji, because no-one else played Fiji last year (which is a bit of an indictment on the game, but that's another story).

And what emerges from the context is that this year, where NH teams have played the same SH opposition (and each other), England have won more comfortably than anyone else. The same Australia who are a shadow of their RWC selves humped Wales pretty thoroughly, didn't they?

Is this a bubble / flash in the pan / Eddie Jones effect that will evaporate? We don't know for sure. And of course, England will lose a game or two before too long. But there's reason to believe that it's sustainable, primarily because it doesn't rely on a small group of players (and there are more in the pipeline) and because there's so much room for improvement in how they play today.
Poorfour
Poorfour

Posts : 6016
Join date : 2011-10-01

Back to top Go down

Most perfectly rated current international player. - Page 3 Empty Re: Most perfectly rated current international player.

Post by No 7&1/2 Tue 06 Dec 2016, 9:21 am

And part of that belief in improvement must come from the average age and from the u20s England teams and how many of those players are getting time on the pitch in the premiership.

No 7&1/2

Posts : 31349
Join date : 2012-10-20

Back to top Go down

Most perfectly rated current international player. - Page 3 Empty Re: Most perfectly rated current international player.

Post by lostinwales Tue 06 Dec 2016, 9:53 am

We will lose at some point. Of course it will happen. And when it does the media will come down on us like a ton of bricks, which will be just as undeserved as all the hyping at the moment.

We are at a strange stage in this sport in general. Despite the amazing record the AB's have put together I don't think they are as strong now as they have been in the past, but it doesn't matter as long as they are stronger than the opposition.

England have not been amazing except in small passages, but they have been stronger than the opposition and most importantly to us supporters they adapt as they play. The whole 'impact from the bench' thing doesn't do any harm at all either

lostinwales
lostinwales
lostinwales

Posts : 13270
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Out of Wales :)

Back to top Go down

Most perfectly rated current international player. - Page 3 Empty Re: Most perfectly rated current international player.

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum