Roger Federer

Go down

Roger Federer

Post by SportFan on Tue 27 Mar 2018, 10:24 am

Roger Federer keeps winning tournaments, despite being in his 40s.

Do you consider Roger Federer to be the Ronnie O'Sullivan of tennis?

SportFan

Posts : 1
Join date : 2018-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by lags72 on Tue 27 Mar 2018, 4:56 pm

To the best of my knowledge Roger Federer is 36 years of age. His ‘40’s’ are some way off.

I don’t follow Ronnie O’Sullivan’s career (although I tend to hear good things about him) and your suggested analogy therefore means nothing to me personally. I would say, however, that the two sports make rather different demands on the body, not to mention the respective standards of physical fitness required to compete at the highest level in each.

lags72

Posts : 4384
Join date : 2011-11-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by CaledonianCraig on Tue 27 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm

Another difference being Roger Federer stands above all else on slam wins in men's tennis - the holy grail. In snooker the holy grail and biggest title is the World Champioship and Ronnie O'Sullivan stands some way behind the top dog - Stephen Hendry.
avatar
CaledonianCraig

Posts : 17433
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 49
Location : Edinburgh

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by Calder106 on Tue 27 Mar 2018, 7:11 pm

Both are unique natural talents in their sports. Biggest difference for me is that Federer loves his tennis and is happy to be on the circuit as long as possible whereas O'Sullivan seems to see snooker and being on the circuit as a bit of chore. I'm sure he could have been a lot more dominant in snooker had he the same outlook as Federer.

Calder106

Posts : 1342
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by No name Bertie on Tue 27 Mar 2018, 11:54 pm

No. The two "sports" cannot be compared. Tennis very much depends on physical strength and endurance as well as skill. The longevity in tennis is limited by the declining ability to maintain physical strength and endurance as the body ages. Snooker is more about skill and physical endurance (not physical strength). The main thing limiting longevity in snooker is maintaining the skill level. To maintain the skill level you have to practice more or less every day for long periods. It is the long hours of practice that players in general lose motivation for when they get older and begin to have other things in their lives.

No name Bertie

Posts : 815
Join date : 2017-02-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by badtennisplayer on Wed 23 May 2018, 8:47 pm

When I watch tennis matches, I often ponder on the similarities between Federer/Nadal and O'Sullivan/Selby

badtennisplayer

Posts : 1
Join date : 2018-05-18

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by Nathaniel Jacobs on Thu 24 May 2018, 2:51 pm

Federer's record is padded up imagine the amount of majors Nadal and Djokovic would had if they've been fortunate to dip their bread against Roddick

Nathaniel Jacobs

Posts : 630
Join date : 2016-12-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by JuliusHMarx on Thu 24 May 2018, 4:13 pm

Nathaniel Jacobs wrote:Federer's record is padded up imagine the amount of majors Nadal and Djokovic would had if they've been fortunate to dip their bread against Roddick

As opposed to all the clay court greats that Nadal has faced.

JuliusHMarx
julius
julius

Posts : 17350
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Paisley Park

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by Nathaniel Jacobs on Thu 24 May 2018, 4:45 pm

JuliusHMarx wrote:
Nathaniel Jacobs wrote:Federer's record is padded up imagine the amount of majors Nadal and Djokovic would had if they've been fortunate to dip their bread against Roddick

As opposed to all the clay court greats that Nadal has faced.
Nadal in any era would've been the greatest on clay, 92% win rate with over 400 wins - ridiculous domination.

Federer has losing records to Nadal and Djokovic in major finals, he merely cleaned up against the no hopers.

Nathaniel Jacobs

Posts : 630
Join date : 2016-12-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by JuliusHMarx on Thu 24 May 2018, 4:49 pm

Yes but Nadal has domination over equally ridiculous no hopers. Federer, Nadal, Djokovic - they're all hopelessly over-rated, having never played anyone any good.

JuliusHMarx
julius
julius

Posts : 17350
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Paisley Park

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by JuliusHMarx on Thu 24 May 2018, 4:59 pm

Take Rafa's 2008 Wimby for example. He only had to beat Roger Federer. Now we all know that Federer's not a grass court great - he only had to beat a bunch of no hopers to win his 8 Wimbledons - hardly qualifies him as a grass court great. Thus Rafa in turn only had to beat an average Joe who isn't that great - hence Rafa's Wimby 2008 isn't much of an achievement.

JuliusHMarx
julius
julius

Posts : 17350
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Paisley Park

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by lags72 on Sun 27 May 2018, 11:20 pm

Nathaniel Jacobs wrote:Federer's record is padded up imagine the amount of majors Nadal and Djokovic would had if they've been fortunate to dip their bread against Roddick

So funny.

I thought for one moment that Simple Analyst (or one of his countless aliases ) had made a surprise re-appearance. Or even the much-missed socal !!

Have often wondered whether that third-form schoolyard banter would ever be seen on 606 again Wink


lags72

Posts : 4384
Join date : 2011-11-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Roger Federer

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum