The Culture Cup Round 6 - new but not really improved

First topic message reminder :

seanmichaels wrote:

JuliusHMarx wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:How's Kim? There was a girl in our meeting who was a bit roomy but had a decent face. Would definitley make love to it given half the chance. I imagine Kim would be like her.

Reason for editing : too many hers, but not to correct 'definitley'

Just bog off

               
That nearly made me ROFLMAO...

She has taken the car, as such, even was I to want to follow your advice it would not be possible. Also it is not payday for either me or TSMR so such wanton luxuries are not an option.

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Rowley wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Why don't you take TSMR out for lunch, Jeff?

She is working.

So go and surprise her on her lunch break, she'll love it.  For f*cks sake, Jeff, I am giving some wonderful advice here and you're just finding reasons why you can't do it.

Dangerous advice. I have visions of surprising the missus at lunch time and stumbling upon the neighbours head between her legs.

I'm pretty sure TSMR won't be doing that at work though?

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Rowley wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Why don't you take TSMR out for lunch, Jeff?

She is working.

So go and surprise her on her lunch break, she'll love it.  For f*cks sake, Jeff, I am giving some wonderful advice here and you're just finding reasons why you can't do it.

Dangerous advice. I have visions of surprising the missus at lunch time and stumbling upon the neighbours head between her legs.

I'm pretty sure TSMR won't be doing that at work though?

Or at any other time I would like to think.

Good point. She probably doesn't know my neighbour as well.

Rowley wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Rowley wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Why don't you take TSMR out for lunch, Jeff?

She is working.

So go and surprise her on her lunch break, she'll love it.  For f*cks sake, Jeff, I am giving some wonderful advice here and you're just finding reasons why you can't do it.

Dangerous advice. I have visions of surprising the missus at lunch time and stumbling upon the neighbours head between her legs.

I'm pretty sure TSMR won't be doing that at work though?

Or at any other time I would like to think.

Eh yeah. That's what I meant.

I'm sure you're all she ever wanted in a man, Jeff.

seanmichaels wrote:Good point. She probably doesn't know my neighbour as well.

  

Flipping heck, Sean. That's twice in a morning. Wasn't expected this when I logged in this morning.

I worked my local polling station for the election yesterday. Not a particularly interesting fact, but thought I would try and steer the conversation away from TSMR's possible infidelities.

Rowley wrote:I worked my local polling station for the election yesterday. Not a particularly interesting fact, but thought I would try and steer the conversation away from TSMR's possible infidelities.

Do you know what TSMR was doing whilst you were doing your civic duty all day?

Is the pay good Jeff?

Union Cane wrote:Is the pay good Jeff?

Not bad mate, day is boring though, as not many people actually bother voting.

Can't be more boring than blathering away on here all day, I might look into doing that for the next election.

Fish chips and peas, standard Friday fare but pleasant enough...

I might be Tino....

rick_dagless wrote:I might be Tino....

There does seem to be a lot in common between us. I used to think I was Superfly I am not so sure now.

To clarify, by saying that I am not not McCartney, I am not saying that I am he, (I'm not), I am simply not saying that I'm not him, as were I to claim that I am not him we would assume he was no more, which he isn't.

There has not been an "Alias-Gate" for some time now.

Though saying that, there is probably one occuring on the boxing board as we speak...

tesco healthy eating chicken and bacon sanwich (rubbish no butter or seasoning) and some salted popcorn (not salty enough).

Kingraf is quite clearly Stuart Hall.

seanmichaels wrote:Kingraf is quite clearly Stuart Hall.

I'll give you £50 if you can guess who I was on the BBC.

seanmichaels wrote:Kingraf is quite clearly Stuart Hall.

The IBF bantamweight champion?

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:Kingraf is quite clearly Stuart Hall.

I'll give you £50 if you can guess who I was on the BBC.

As in your 606 moniker or paedoceleb?

Raf did get accused recently of being Az. I deleted the offending posts as I would not wish that on even someone with raf's liberal approach to the use of hash tags.

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:Kingraf is quite clearly Stuart Hall.

I'll give you £50 if you can guess who I was on the BBC.

As in your 606 moniker or paedoceleb?

Moniker.

Rowley wrote:Raf did get accused recently of being Az. I deleted the offending posts as I would not wish that on even someone with raf's liberal approach to the use of hash tags.

Az is Izzi.

He will let his guard down soon.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:Kingraf is quite clearly Stuart Hall.

I'll give you £50 if you can guess who I was on the BBC.

As in your 606 moniker or paedoceleb?

Moniker.

always had a suspicion that you were philsmithy but he was a bit arsey sometimes.

Maybe Scottrf, but he was a bit more Boxing savvy (no offense)

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:Kingraf is quite clearly Stuart Hall.

I'll give you £50 if you can guess who I was on the BBC.

As in your 606 moniker or paedoceleb?

Moniker.

always had a suspicion that you were philsmithy but he was a bit arsey sometimes.

Nope.

F*ck you, Ricko.

salfordviking? liked him

Tino wrote:F*ck you, Ricko..

ceej?

scottrf seems a bit highly strung these days.

rick_dagless wrote:

Tino wrote:F*ck you, Ricko..

ceej?

F*ck you again, Ricko.

seanmichaels wrote:scottrf seems a bit highly strung these days.

He always was. I like Scott a lot but he is only ever a period away from being Strongback.

Mclusky?

Maybe not, he was quite funny.

Would love to think Julius is/was LondonRingRules

Union Cane wrote:Mclusky?

Maybe not, he was quite funny.

Superfly has already done that exact same joke.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Union Cane wrote:Mclusky?

Maybe not, he was quite funny.

Superfly has already done that exact same joke.

Great minds, and all that...

Shah = adad?

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:scottrf seems a bit highly strung these days.

He always was.  I like Scott a lot but he is only ever a period away from being Strongback.

It is ever since him and trott broke up. He took it very badly.

Rowley wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:scottrf seems a bit highly strung these days.

He always was.  I like Scott a lot but he is only ever a period away from being Strongback.

It is ever since him and trott broke up. He took it very badly.

Quite possibly. Trott makes fleeting appearances on v2 and then disappears again. I like him.

Emore?

Union Cane wrote:Emore?

Seriously? Is that really what you think of me?

Well you are prone to the odd hissy fit...

Was you jimmy Stuart Tina (pre lobotomy obviously)

Rowley wrote:Was you jimmy Stuart Tina (pre lobotomy obviously).

I had Jimmy down as Rodders on here...

rodders was on BBC.

Union Cane wrote:Well you are prone to the odd hissy fit...

You cannot add Union Cane to your ignore-list because he belongs to the forum Administrators or Moderators groups.

B*llocks.

sean wrote:rodders was on BBC.

Fair enough, do not remember him over there...

c'mon tino you cnut. tell us who you were.