TNA impact tour

This is coming to Nottingham, is it worth coing to for £23??

Also will Hogan be there etc or will it be the background stars like Kendrick and Samoa Joe?

AntLord wrote: background stars like Samoa Joe?

And there's your answer why it's probably not worth paying £23 anymore.

what you mean?

23 pounds very cheap

I'd rather have root canal work without an anastethic.

What I mean is that guys like Samoa Joe, AJ Styles, Morgan, Chris Daniels, etc should not be thought of in TNA as ‘background’ stars.
Joe’s a guy that had an eighteen month unbeaten streak, Joe’s a guy who put on 5 star matches with Punk, Kobashi, AJ and Daniels, Joe’s a guy who TNA should be building the company around if they truly believe ‘wrestling matters’ yet as you say Joe is now nothing more than a ‘background’ star.

joe not a great athlete a bit fat

HE'S FAT

pauline1981 wrote:joe not a great athlete a bit fat

He's still a very good wrestler. He's wasted in TNA, although if he went off to WWE they'd probably do what they did with Umaga and put him a really stereotypical, bordering on racist Samoan gimmick and push him for a couple of months before getting squashed by John Cena.

i agree john cena would win

Samoa Joe is an excellent wrestler when he is fit. He isnt fit currently and I dont think ever recovered from the nation of violence gimmick!

Is this the 'i know nothing about wrestling' thread?

He's FAT

So back to the orignal question instead of an "I love Samoa Joe" thread

Is it worth going to this or not?

Yes TNA is quality.

Get yourself involved AntLord.

I went in january last year when they came to Bournemouth.

Got to meet Velvet Sky & Madison Rayne. Worth the enterance fee alone.

westisbest wrote:

Got to meet Velvet Sky & Madison Rayne. Worth the enterance fee alone.

I'd pay the full £75 for that!

Umaga was fat, Earthquake was fat, Vader was fat, Bam Bam Bigelow was fat, Yokozuna was fat, Andre was fat, King Kong Bundy was fat.
And your point is?

£23, if they use it to put on a ‘wrestling’ show consisting of the likes of Joe, AJ, Daniels, Shelley, Roode, Angle, Young, Morgan etc then yes it’s well worth it.
If they use it to instead have 3 knockout matches, Orlando Jordan going over Joe cleanly, Ric Flair blading himself over his jacket, Karen Jarrett having 3 in-ring appearances screeching like a harpy at Angle, Bischoff coming out and telling fans they’re idiots and yet another plan to poopie over what TNA stood for then I’d perhaps advise to spend your £23 elsewhere.

I haven't watched any wrestling for years, but when I did Joe was brilliant. Have TNA really gone so wrong that he, Styles and Roode are not the top dogs? All had the potential to be world class and make huge names for themselves.

Watch Joe in his early TNA days and his matches from the indys you'll see that yes he is a big lad but for someone of his size he moves tremendously well.

Joe v Punk, Joe v Styles v Daniels, Joe v Kobashi all in my top 10 matches.

Hero wrote:Umaga was fat, Earthquake was fat, Vader was fat, Bam Bam Bigelow was fat, Yokozuna was fat, Andre was fat, King Kong Bundy was fat.
And your point is?

£23, if they use it to put on a ‘wrestling’ show consisting of the likes of Joe, AJ, Daniels, Shelley, Roode, Angle, Young, Morgan etc then yes it’s well worth it.
If they use it to instead have 3 knockout matches, Orlando Jordan going over Joe cleanly, Ric Flair blading himself over his jacket, Karen Jarrett having 3 in-ring appearances screeching like a harpy at Angle, Bischoff coming out and telling fans they’re idiots and yet another plan to poopie over what TNA stood for then I’d perhaps advise to spend your £23 elsewhere.

you are right being fat is not a bad thing.i liked earthquake he was cool