How Many Runs Will England Make On Day Two?

How many? I'll say 380 runs.

400, 420 I think they'll make

Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

Ah, the WUMS have returned.

The pitch will spin the more the match goes on so if England do get bowled out for 200-250 (Very unlikely) then India will be lucky if they reach 150.

I think the leg spinner will play a big role, but I would also say that Strauss and Cook are probably our worst two players of spin out of our batsmen and we already have over 80 on the board. I think somewhere between 350 and 400 is likely.

Depends how Bell and Morgan do for me in that case as 2 of the best players of spin we have

500

Sorry to be a tad pedantic - but not sure about the question - is it what will the England total be at the end of day 2, or is it how many runs will we score on day 2 (ie not including those scored on day 1 .

10000

cricketfan90 wrote:10000

to be fair i been drinking i just turneed 18

Liam_Main wrote:The pitch will spin the more the match goes on so if England do get bowled out for 200-250 (Very unlikely) then India will be lucky if they reach 150.

If the pitch spins, it was already spinning today for Mishra(albeit is was slow turn), then England have the problems, as Swann isn't a threat to India, as his series figures prove - 2 wickets @ 116.5 each and strike-rate of 180. Swann wasn't very threatening on the turning pitches in India either,

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:The pitch will spin the more the match goes on so if England do get bowled out for 200-250 (Very unlikely) then India will be lucky if they reach 150.

If the pitch spins, it was already spinning today for Mishra(albeit is was slow turn), then England have the problems, as Swann isn't a threat to India, as his series figures prove - 2 wickets @ 116.5 each and strike-rate of 180. Swann wasn't very threatening on the turning pitches in India either,

looks like anither wum showed up

*another

Sonic has boomed

I'm going for 308 runs

EDIT: CF, you're no in the chat box anymore. You could just edit the spelling error

What is this WUM? or you mean worm? Either way slightly offensive.

lol yh i no mate,

punter: it means u have nothing constrctive to say

cricketfan90 wrote:lol yh i no mate,

punter: it means u have nothing constrctive to say

Sure I've played grade cricket in Perth, so I've got plenty so say.

He does indeed mean WUM. It stands for Windows Update Manager. CF has this way of giving a running commentary from his computer screen and I guess the quote was a cause of his unmindful state brought on by the guzzling of alcoholic beverages. I hope this clears things up for you

Bit harsh to call someone a WUM because they point to a bowler's figures and make a prediction on that basis! That's simply a point of view - even if you (and I) may happen to disagree with it! How many beers have you had CF?

Legend wrote:He does indeed mean WUM. It stands for Windows Update Manager. CF has this way of giving a running commentary from his computer screen and I guess the quote was a cause of his unmindful state brought on by the guzzling of alcoholic beverages. I hope this clears things up for you

u feeling alrigt u never post on cricket section

Corporalhumblebucket wrote:Bit harsh to call someone a WUM because they point to a bowler's figures and make a prediction on that basis! That's simply a point of view - even if you (and I) may happen to disagree with it!

Facts are facts, if he had taken 15 wickets @ 10 a piece, then there still would be no argument. Swann isn't threatening for this opposition.

My bad. I'll go hurdling back to the empty sections from which I hail.

Corporalhumblebucket wrote:Bit harsh to call someone a WUM because they point to a bowler's figures and make a prediction on that basis! That's simply a point of view - even if you (and I) may happen to disagree with it! How many beers have you had CF?

none

cricketfan90 wrote:

Corporalhumblebucket wrote:Bit harsh to call someone a WUM because they point to a bowler's figures and make a prediction on that basis! That's simply a point of view - even if you (and I) may happen to disagree with it! How many beers have you had CF?

none

Ciders? Ales? erm.....

give me abreak i just turned 18

ah i remember when i turned 18, only the 1 cider because i had school/rugby the next day, and it was a saturday.........

cricketfan90 wrote:

Corporalhumblebucket wrote:Bit harsh to call someone a WUM because they point to a bowler's figures and make a prediction on that basis! That's simply a point of view - even if you (and I) may happen to disagree with it! How many beers have you had CF?

none

The lot, haha

baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

i have my 20th this year, think me and mates are going to cardiff for the night

The question is how many runs wil we make on Day 2 excluding Day1.

Duty281 wrote:The question is how many runs wil we make on Day 2 excluding Day1.

None because we are a team of pub players

You play grade cricket in Perth Punter? I play 1st eleven cricket in Leicestershire?! What's your point?

cricketfan90 wrote:give me abreak i just turned 18

Hope you had a great time, Happy Birthday.

I turned 40 this year but was too ill to go out. darn it. Making up for it when in a holiday coming up soon.

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

trebellbobaggins wrote:

cricketfan90 wrote:give me abreak i just turned 18

Hope you had a great time, Happy Birthday.

I turned 40 this year but was too ill to go out. darn it. Making up for it when in a holiday coming up soon.

Hes having a better day than Mishra and Longhop

Liam_Main wrote:

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

Swann won't take a wicket in the 2nd innings.

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

Swann won't take a wicket in the 2nd innings.

You're quite right, he won't take a wicket. He'll take at least 3 or 4!

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

Swann won't take a wicket in the 2nd innings.

You're quite right, he won't take a wicket. He'll take at least 3 or 4!

2 wickets @ 116.5 apiece hahahaha

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

Swann won't take a wicket in the 2nd innings.

You're quite right, he won't take a wicket. He'll take at least 3 or 4!

2 wickets @ 116.5 apiece hahahaha

It's hard to take your opinion seriously.

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

Swann won't take a wicket in the 2nd innings.

You're quite right, he won't take a wicket. He'll take at least 3 or 4!

2 wickets @ 116.5 apiece hahahaha

It's hard to take your opinion seriously.

So I give you a fact, you don't like it? Grow up. Stats show Swann as nothing more than cannon fodder.

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

Swann won't take a wicket in the 2nd innings.

You're quite right, he won't take a wicket. He'll take at least 3 or 4!

2 wickets @ 116.5 apiece hahahaha

It's hard to take your opinion seriously.

So I give you a fact, you don't like it? Grow up. Stats show Swann as nothing more than cannon fodder.

Yes an average of 28.81 and an average Econ of 2.92 with 162 wkts show he really is cannon fodder.

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Duty281 wrote:

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

Swann won't take a wicket in the 2nd innings.

You're quite right, he won't take a wicket. He'll take at least 3 or 4!

2 wickets @ 116.5 apiece hahahaha

It's hard to take your opinion seriously.

So I give you a fact, you don't like it? Grow up. Stats show Swann as nothing more than cannon fodder.

Yes an average of 28.81 and an average Econ of 2.92 with 162 wkts show he really is cannon fodder.

FYI he has 142 wickets, but I'll let you off.

Secondly career record doesn't come into it, Swann bowling at India - not SA, SL, WI, OZ, BANG, PAK

"Grow Up"?

Punter's Dodgy Digit wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:

longhopmerchant wrote:Laughable suggestions. The little leggie will come into the game, and he's spun the ball more than Swann (who's useless vs India)

200-250 runs.

HA! Past that already and where only 2 down.

Swann won't take a wicket in the 2nd innings.

You could well be right, our three seamers could well do all the damage before Swann is even required again.

Swann = Cannon fodder.

Mishra = ermmmm....