Grass or Clay

Both bring out a different style of play, but which do you prefer and why?

Grass - I prefer faster courts.

Although I do like how points can be constructed on clay.

I like both equally. My favourite part of the clay season is watching the Nadal topspin forehand. For grass is the touch and variety of shots on display from all players.

They seem to play out of their minds on grass but just get bogged down in pottering about on clay

this may sound stupid, but I can't really say which I prefer....I like them both:natural, organic, beautiful surface to play; clay brings out tenacity, craft, passion fire out of tennis while grass draws out the best off a talent: quickness, shotmaking, and definitely the artistry.
It's a shame grass season is virtually non-existant so you almost don't have time to get into it and enjoy it as it deserves: by the time you've sobered yourself from clay, Wimbledon is upon you and you can' afford not to get into it semidizzy, by the time you are fully into it it's over

I went for Grass

I love it's recreational use

legendkillar wrote:I went for Grass

I love it's recreational use

Glad you didn't go into details

Wimbledon is slower than the FO nowadays. Certainly the case the second week of Wimbledon.

I like hardcourts I think they are the fairest surface to all the players and the different styles of play.

Grass doent get your socks so dirty