Is this era weak?

Djokovic is now the world number one, having taken over from Rafael Nadull. The two drudging, talentless moonballers have bored us all to death for the last year or so now, and with the greatest player of all time postively a tennis OAP at 30 still managing to be the most exciting player by miles, and also still ranked 3rd, this leads me to suggest this era is incredibly weak and will be untill either Federer or Murray become world number one.

Do you agree?

I'd love to get my HANS on some SPAGHETTI right now

zaaaaaa wrote:Djokovic is now the world number one, having taken over from Rafael Nadull. The two drudging, talentless moonballers have bored us all to death for the last year or so now, and with the greatest player of all time postively a tennis OAP at 30 still managing to be the most exciting player by miles, and also still ranked 3rd, this leads me to suggest this era is incredibly weak and will be untill either Federer or Murray become world number one.

Do you agree?

I would not agree on what you say, but I could follow the logic of your reasoning until the highlighted bit. But when you talk about Murray implying he is more talented than Djokovic or Nadal you make your argument appear ludicrous, and spare me the need to take it seriously as a consequence

This is pretty funny, I bet some of the same people who are fighting and arguing with me about how its not fair to call the crappy era of one slam wonders weak are the ones voting that the current era is weak. Reminds of our friend BB, who is so outraged to find out that I view any era Roger dominated as being weak. While at the same time he does an entire thread on how the current era is weak. No zaaaa, the era that was weak was the era that saw world beating one slam wonders rise up more often than people change socks. You know when guys like Rios and Moya got to #1.

It was a weak era when Federer was at the helm so the era is very weak indeed.

No *weaker* than any other *era* over the past 70 years

or so !

I agree wholeheartedly about Djoker and the Nadull boring us to tears.

Can't think of two more boring players at the top of the game since.. well since forever.

Both are just road runners and defensive retrievers.

The Nadull is the most aesthetically displeasing player I have ever seen on a tennis court.

I think even his ( teenage female) fans would secretly acknowledge that.

socal1976 wrote:This is pretty funny, I bet some of the same people who are fighting and arguing with me about how its not fair to call the crappy era of one slam wonders weak are the ones voting that the current era is weak. Reminds of our friend BB, who is so outraged to find out that I view any era Roger dominated as being weak. While at the same time he does an entire thread on how the current era is weak. No zaaaa, the era that was weak was the era that saw world beating one slam wonders rise up more often than people change socks. You know when guys like Rios and Moya got to #1.

Except he doesn't, and the problem is that you can't read.