The Ultimate question

Which is better to watch and comment why

Its not exactly an ultimate question is it.

WWE is superior in every possible way.

I prefer to watch TNA, its more entertaining and the women are nicer

Ha! It's like waking up 18 months back on the old 606.

Somebody should open a new thread with a title along the lines of tna rulz wwe sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!lol!

Had to be done

AntLord wrote:I prefer to watch TNA, its more entertaining and the women are nicer

I take it you like The Only Way Is Essex too right?

Am I not allowed an opinion?

I wish you werent.

AntLord wrote:Am I not allowed an opinion?

Have you paid your subscription fee?

I agree with AntLord.

Mr H wrote:I wish you werent.

Legendary.

sarcastic fool

I picked Other. Female Fatale's in Chocolate Syrup - Sky 917 1.30 am on a Saturday morning. Gripping entertainment.

..............at least I think its wrestling

I'll sky plus that!

WWE is better to watch, and my reason is that it's because I like it more than TNA.

AntLord wrote:I'll sky plus that!

Won't your girlfriend go ma...Oh no, sorry.

Despite having great talent tna is a million miles away from

I enjoy impact and do watch regularly but certain things frustrate the hell out of me! However i do feel that the current Roode centric plot including the BFG series just goes to show what tna can do when they get it right. They seam to have an obsession with recreating the past and harking back to times gone by, a little more focus on where the business is going and less on where it's comes from should be top of tna's to do list.

IMO when tna get it right they hit a home run however when it's bad it's really bad (sort of reminds me of my beloved spurs!).

Home runs:

Lockdown, having every match on the ppv inside a steel cage, wwe have tried to recreated this with hiac and fatal four way but don't commit to it, they just use it for the main events, if your going to call your ppv fatal four way then at least put all the matches into that format!

BFG and wrestling maters again, this competition really puts an emphasis on wins and loses and in any pro sport this should be paramount! wwe don't want to be associated with the word wrestling but tna embrase it and for that I give them props.

Just a couple of my thoughts, I know there has been plenty of 'own goals' by tna infact more than I could write. Would be interesting to hear others 'home runs' and 'own goals' by tan tho!

Tan!!!!!! Damn predictive text!!! Obviously ment tna!

i like wrestling and i like smarties and i like postman pat and i like music and i like paper bags and i like mortgages and i like staples and i like wood flooring and i like gravel and i like the number 4 and i like the number 6 and i like traffic

You like mortgages?

i dont like cricket

..i love it

I've always watched WWE...I never even realised TNA existed until I came on here...

I actually voted other because for quality of wrestling no one beats ROH.

But on the whole WWE v TNA debate - unfortunately TNA has gained a reputation for being the place to go when you get FE'd from the WWE. Jeff Jerrett obviously had aspirations above what he could achieve in the WWE and for the first 5 years or so of TNA's existence it was just his playground winning King of the Mountain and becoming a multi-time world champion. Unlike WCW back in the mid 90s when it exploded, TNA hasn't used its 'veterans' anywhere near as well - when Hogan left for WCW it wasn't because WWF were about to drop him, it was because WCW offered him more and to remain centre stage. His heel turn with the NWO is arguably the biggest heel turn in modern wrestling and he was still able to accomplish new and innovative things in WCW. In TNA? He's done nothing but massage his own ego. The only veteran who has brought something remotely original to TNA is Sting with his new Joker gimmick. But all the other ex-WCW guys are just parasites sucking the life out of TNA. WWE is far more progressive and forward looking - despite being guilty of some dodgy short term booking. Punk leaving the company with the title at MITB, Vince getting fired and HHH becoming COO is unprecedented. 2011 truly has been a historical year for the company. TNA continues to take two steps forward and one step back, forever hindering them from becoming a great wrestling promotion anywhere near WWE's level.

WWE all the way

TNA SUCK !!!

WWE sucks recently to be fair, TNA seems to have more believable story lines

AntLord wrote:WWE sucks recently to be fair, TNA seems to have more believable story lines

more believable? what's so unbelievable about a 400+ pounds man becoming world heavyweight champ after dominating a smaller champion? What's unbelievable about Vince getting fired after Punk left with the WWE title at MITB and now HHH is losing the confidence of the locker room because he's inexperienced and has made rash decisions? The storylines work for me.

4 people dont have a clue !

As far as ultimate questions go, this wouldn't make it into the top trillion