would roh do better than tna if on tv

roh are 1 of the best wrestling companies in america today. full of talent and exciting shows.

I'd say no. There's no denying that they have an insane amount of talent, but how much of that talent could be marketed towards the average wrestling audience?

Where ROH lacks is in the instant bums on seats names.
The likes of Eddie Edwards, Roderick Strong and the Briscoes aren't going to bring in the casual fan in the same way that a 'name' like Hogan, Flair, Angle etc does.
While the quality of the PPVs is often in ROH's favour if you pitted it against TNA I unfortunately could see only one winner.
Which is a tremendous shame as the PPV last night was on all accounts fantastic and blew anything that TNA have done in the Hogan era out of the water.

if they need a name to get popular then they need to be on tv or its just going to be going around circles.

if they start regularly then pull in a big name surely that's going to make the promotion better known publicity and raise more funds to bring in others aswell which would push the promotion forward instead of being a Indy promotion?