International Boxing Organisation - why is not considered one of the better boxing organisations?

Honesty. Integrity. Trust.

From its inception, the IBO's mandate has been to bring these qualities to boxing. The record shows that we’ve been – and continue to be – successful. That's why world class talent like Lennox Lewis, Wladimir Klitschko, Ricky Hatton, Manny Pacquiao, and so many others have been proud to wear our belt. And that’s why the IBO's objective, comprehensive computerized rankings remain the most reliable and honest in the sport.

wrote:As the most representative organization of Professional Boxing, where the right application of the fundamental principles of ethics, moral, loyalty, honesty and good faith can be found, considered as the main values, which orientates all legitimate activity of the Professional Boxing Worldwide.

joeyjojo618 wrote:

wrote:As the most representative organization of Professional Boxing, where the right application of the fundamental principles of ethics, moral, loyalty, honesty and good faith can be found, considered as the main values, which orientates all legitimate activity of the Professional Boxing Worldwide.

This is essentially the same BS on the WBA website. However, I guess the point is whether the IBO ranking system is fair and objective. I have no idea, but I suspect Truss has it right; if they were big they would be just as crooked as the rest.