ITV's Steve Ryder (or is it Rider)

Until I raised the issue about Ry/ider's comments during the WvF game, I'm pretty sure that Ryder was the spelling.

But now I google it it is Rider.

I only ask this because I'm raising a complaint about his comments with ITV and Ofcom.

Problem is that I'm getting more and more enwebbed in a Kafkaesque bureaucracy.

OUt of interest what did he say to prompt the complaint. I don't use ITV coverage.

red_stag wrote:OUt of interest what did he say to prompt the complaint. I don't use ITV coverage.

Ryder/Rider consistently at half time and after time ridiculed AR's decision and stoked the fire of discontent. The studio pundits didn't help wit their lack of Law knowledge.

But Ryder/Rider was a homer slut.

He also repeatedly said things like "the worst decision of the RWC"

I voted for "Portnoy, you are looking for a conspiracy where none exists".

You need a girl mate, or if you already have one you need a better one and spend more time with her and not conspiracy hunting

This post did make me laugh a wee bit though

RuggerRadge2611 wrote:I voted for "Portnoy, you are looking for a conspiracy where none exists".

You need a girl mate, or if you already have one you need a better one and spend more time with her and not conspiracy hunting

This post did make me laugh a wee bit though

+1 Good job Portnoy. Radge is right.

red_stag wrote:

RuggerRadge2611 wrote:I voted for "Portnoy, you are looking for a conspiracy where none exists".

You need a girl mate, or if you already have one you need a better one and spend more time with her and not conspiracy hunting

This post did make me laugh a wee bit though

+1 Good job Portnoy. Radge is right.

To be honest, I knew that the Portnoy/conspiracy theory would prevail.

But there again - no-one else is trying to get through the process. It's an effin nightmare.

And if I get much more negativism about complaining about pursuing Ri/yders's comments, I'll stop and let the bar attendant get off scot free.

What do you think?

It's not necessary to worry about letting him off scott free, but was it really necessary to start a whole new article about something you're already covering elsewhere?

Not sure why there would be a conspiricy over the spelling of his name, but I do think that what he said was wrong.

greybeard wrote:It's not necessary to worry about letting him off scott free, but was it really necessary to start a whole new article about something you're already covering elsewhere?

No. It's just a bit of emotional steam being let off here whilst trying to batter down the mighty doors of mega-enterprise officialdom.

Sorry to waste your clicks.