About v2Hopkins v Daswon - No decision
2 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Hopkins v Daswon - No decision
by two_tone Fri 16 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Bernard Hopkins has been handed an early Christmas present with his controversial technical knockout defeat at the hands of Chad Dawson changed to a no decision.
The California State Athletic Commission took just over two hours to overturn the decision that had dealt Hopkins a loss after he was lifted and tossed down into the ropes by Dawson in the second round of their WBC light-heavyweight title fight at the Staples Center on October 15.
Hopkins, at 46 the oldest major champion in boxing history, dislocated his shoulder, and under the rules, the fight should have been stopped and ruled a no decision because it was prior to the fourth round, after which it goes to the scorecards.
Referee Pat Russell called it a TKO but it will now be changed to a no-decision and Hopkins' record will stand at 52-5-2 with the WBC having already ruled that 'The Executioner' would keep his title belt.
Testimony
"Justice was served today," said a delighted Hopkins.
"I am thrilled that the California State Athletic Commission did the right thing and removed that loss from my record. Mistakes happen, but what you do to fix those mistakes is what counts.
"The footage of the fight that was reviewed over and over again, proved to be the key testimony. I think it came down to the tape.
"Both of our sides were making good points, but it was a dinner without a turkey. The tape was the turkey. I am happy this ordeal is over.
"Now I can focus on continuing to rehab my shoulder and get ready to fight again, hopefully early next year. I will start my usual boxing routine in a couple of weeks and get ready to defend my titles again."
Not sure if this has been posted already but thought I would share just incase. Right decision I think can't believe it has taken this long to sort out!
The California State Athletic Commission took just over two hours to overturn the decision that had dealt Hopkins a loss after he was lifted and tossed down into the ropes by Dawson in the second round of their WBC light-heavyweight title fight at the Staples Center on October 15.
Hopkins, at 46 the oldest major champion in boxing history, dislocated his shoulder, and under the rules, the fight should have been stopped and ruled a no decision because it was prior to the fourth round, after which it goes to the scorecards.
Referee Pat Russell called it a TKO but it will now be changed to a no-decision and Hopkins' record will stand at 52-5-2 with the WBC having already ruled that 'The Executioner' would keep his title belt.
Testimony
"Justice was served today," said a delighted Hopkins.
"I am thrilled that the California State Athletic Commission did the right thing and removed that loss from my record. Mistakes happen, but what you do to fix those mistakes is what counts.
"The footage of the fight that was reviewed over and over again, proved to be the key testimony. I think it came down to the tape.
"Both of our sides were making good points, but it was a dinner without a turkey. The tape was the turkey. I am happy this ordeal is over.
"Now I can focus on continuing to rehab my shoulder and get ready to fight again, hopefully early next year. I will start my usual boxing routine in a couple of weeks and get ready to defend my titles again."
Not sure if this has been posted already but thought I would share just incase. Right decision I think can't believe it has taken this long to sort out!
two_tone- Posts : 818
Join date : 2011-08-19
Age : 37
Location : Brighton
Re: Hopkins v Daswon - No decision
by Union Cane Fri 16 Dec 2011, 5:06 pm
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=1414&cat=boxer
Don't tell Michaels!
Don't tell Michaels!
Union Cane- Moderator
- Posts : 11328
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 48
Location : Whatever truculent means, if that's good, I'm that.
Similar topics» when are the CSAC going to overturn the bogus Hopkins Dawson decision so BHOP can be recognised as lineal champ?
» Bernard Hopkins, 49, is ducking Hamed, 40, just cos Naz, 40, is younger than Hopkins, 49. This is why Hopkins, 49, is fighting Beibut Shumenov, 30, who’s youger than Naz, 40,
» Hamed, 39-Bernard Hopkins, 48, in May cos Naz, 39, is younger than Hopkins, 48, n cos Hopkins, 48, is still fightin (just beat Murat, 30, who is younger than Naz, 39
» Hook replaces Jones for Wales' Scots trip
» Can Judges override a ref's decision?
» Bernard Hopkins, 49, is ducking Hamed, 40, just cos Naz, 40, is younger than Hopkins, 49. This is why Hopkins, 49, is fighting Beibut Shumenov, 30, who’s youger than Naz, 40,
» Hamed, 39-Bernard Hopkins, 48, in May cos Naz, 39, is younger than Hopkins, 48, n cos Hopkins, 48, is still fightin (just beat Murat, 30, who is younger than Naz, 39
» Hook replaces Jones for Wales' Scots trip
» Can Judges override a ref's decision?
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|