About v2Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
+4
mobilemaster8
ShahenshahG
Champagne_Socialist
Spring
8 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Spring Sun 19 May 2013, 6:14 am
younger than Prince Naseem Hamed, 39).
Spring- Posts : 65
Join date : 2011-05-13
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Champagne_Socialist Sun 19 May 2013, 6:37 am
what is the point of this thread? I don't get it.
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by ShahenshahG Sun 19 May 2013, 8:33 am
Encore
ShahenshahG- Posts : 15725
Join date : 2011-02-11
Age : 38
Location : The happiest man a morning ever sees -
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Spring Tue 21 May 2013, 3:04 am
Champagne_Socialist wrote:what is the point of this thread? I don't get it.
The point of this thread is to show why and when Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, and Shane Mosley, 41, could fight. Could be in August because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is younger than Shane Mosley, 41, and because Shane Mosley, 41, is still fighting (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is younger than Prince Naseem Hamed, 39), but Shane Mosley, 41, will never agree to fight Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, just because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is not as young as Pablo Cano, 23.
Spring- Posts : 65
Join date : 2011-05-13
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Champagne_Socialist Tue 21 May 2013, 3:22 am
Spring wrote:Champagne_Socialist wrote:what is the point of this thread? I don't get it.
The point of this thread is to show why and when Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, and Shane Mosley, 41, could fight. Could be in August because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is younger than Shane Mosley, 41, and because Shane Mosley, 41, is still fighting (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is younger than Prince Naseem Hamed, 39), but Shane Mosley, 41, will never agree to fight Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, just because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is not as young as Pablo Cano, 23.
o that clears things up.
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Spring Tue 21 May 2013, 6:22 am
Champagne_Socialist wrote:Spring wrote:Champagne_Socialist wrote:what is the point of this thread? I don't get it.
The point of this thread is to show why and when Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, and Shane Mosley, 41, could fight. Could be in August because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is younger than Shane Mosley, 41, and because Shane Mosley, 41, is still fighting (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is younger than Prince Naseem Hamed, 39), but Shane Mosley, 41, will never agree to fight Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, just because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is not as young as Pablo Cano, 23.
o that clears things up.
Exactly. It's terrible to see how Shane Mosley, 41, is ducking Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, and will duck Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, just because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is not as young as Pablo Cano, 23, and this is why Shane Mosley, 41, sucks.
Spring- Posts : 65
Join date : 2011-05-13
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Champagne_Socialist Tue 21 May 2013, 7:28 am
Spring wrote:Champagne_Socialist wrote:Spring wrote:Champagne_Socialist wrote:what is the point of this thread? I don't get it.
The point of this thread is to show why and when Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, and Shane Mosley, 41, could fight. Could be in August because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is younger than Shane Mosley, 41, and because Shane Mosley, 41, is still fighting (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is younger than Prince Naseem Hamed, 39), but Shane Mosley, 41, will never agree to fight Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, just because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is not as young as Pablo Cano, 23.
o that clears things up.
Exactly. It's terrible to see how Shane Mosley, 41, is ducking Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, and will duck Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, just because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is not as young as Pablo Cano, 23, and this is why Shane Mosley, 41, sucks.
not as much as your threads.
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by mobilemaster8 Tue 21 May 2013, 10:08 am
Haha! Quality! This has been my morning laugh cheers gents.
Spring.....pleasure as always my friend.
Spring.....pleasure as always my friend.
mobilemaster8- Posts : 4302
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 37
Location : Stoke on Trent
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by John Bloody Wayne Tue 21 May 2013, 11:05 am
Spring, you're so biased towards UK fighters it's unreal. You give Shane a hard time for not facing Hamed, 39, because he's younger than Mosely, 41, but what about Froch, 35, who's facing Kessler, 34, because Kessler's younger than Hamed, 39?
Why doesn't Froch, 35, suck, Spring, 11?
Why doesn't Froch, 35, suck, Spring, 11?
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by 88Chris05 Tue 21 May 2013, 11:07 am
That's twice in five minutes I've had to remove a post of yours for trying to swerve the swear filter, Davide. So if you could refrain rom now on, that'd be grand, old bean!
88Chris05- Moderator
- Posts : 9646
Join date : 2011-02-16
Age : 35
Location : Nottingham
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by ShahenshahG Tue 21 May 2013, 11:08 am
John Bloody Wayne wrote:Spring, you're so biased towards UK fighters it's unreal. You give Shane a hard time for not facing Hamed, 39, because he's younger than Mosely, 41, but what about Froch, 35, who's facing Kessler, 34, because Kessler's younger than Hamed, 39?
Why doesn't Froch, 35, suck, Spring, 11?
because hamed 39 plus shae mosely 41 - spring 11 = 69 - doesnt work with froch 35
Duh
ShahenshahG- Posts : 15725
Join date : 2011-02-11
Age : 38
Location : The happiest man a morning ever sees -
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by davidemore Tue 21 May 2013, 11:14 am
Chris WTF! Why are we even on this thread? It's nonsense, and i know for a fact you've banned me for far less in the past, old bean.
davidemore- Posts : 2693
Join date : 2011-12-21
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by John Bloody Wayne Tue 21 May 2013, 11:15 am
Of course, how could I be so daft?
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Steffan Tue 21 May 2013, 2:38 pm
Spring your a legend 
Regards Fella
Steffan
Regards Fella
Steffan
Steffan- Posts : 7856
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 43
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by ShahenshahG Tue 21 May 2013, 3:23 pm
Whatever daffyd dil - once more unto the breach dear spring.
ShahenshahG- Posts : 15725
Join date : 2011-02-11
Age : 38
Location : The happiest man a morning ever sees -
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Spring Wed 22 May 2013, 1:19 am
John Bloody Wayne wrote:Spring, you're so biased towards UK fighters it's unreal. You give Shane a hard time for not facing Hamed, 39, because he's younger than Mosely, 41, but what about Froch, 35, who's facing Kessler, 34, because Kessler's younger than Hamed, 39?
Why doesn't Froch, 35, suck, Spring, 11?
Carl Froch, 35, sucks because Carl Froch, 35, is ducking Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, just because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is not as old as Bernard Hopkins, 48. This is why Carl Froch, 35, and Bernard Hopkins, 48, can fight if Carl Froch, 35, beats Mikkel Kessler and if Bernard Hopkins, 48, beats Karo Murat, and this is why Carl Froch, 35, and Bernard Hopkins, 48, suck.
Spring- Posts : 65
Join date : 2011-05-13
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Spring Wed 22 May 2013, 1:21 am
ShahenshahG wrote:John Bloody Wayne wrote:Spring, you're so biased towards UK fighters it's unreal. You give Shane a hard time for not facing Hamed, 39, because he's younger than Mosely, 41, but what about Froch, 35, who's facing Kessler, 34, because Kessler's younger than Hamed, 39?
Why doesn't Froch, 35, suck, Spring, 11?
because hamed 39 plus shae mosely 41 - spring 11 = 69 - doesnt work with froch 35
Duh
Carl Froch, 35, sucks because Carl Froch, 35, is ducking Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, just because Prince Naseem Hamed, 39, is not as old as Bernard Hopkins, 48. This is why Carl Froch, 35, and Bernard Hopkins, 48, can fight if Carl Froch, 35, beats Mikkel Kessler and if Bernard Hopkins, 48, beats Karo Murat, and this is why Carl Froch, 35, and Bernard Hopkins, 48, suck.
Spring- Posts : 65
Join date : 2011-05-13
Re: Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 41, in August cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 41, n cos Mosley, 41, is still fightin (just beat Pablo Cano, 23, who is
by Sponsored content
Sponsored content
Similar topics» Hamed, 39-Shane Mosley, 42, in May cos Naz, 39, is younger than Mosley, 42, n cos Mosley, 42, is still fightin (just fought Anthony Mundine, 38, who is younger than Naz, 39, in
» Hamed, 39-Bernard Hopkins, 48, in May cos Naz, 39, is younger than Hopkins, 48, n cos Hopkins, 48, is still fightin (just beat Murat, 30, who is younger than Naz, 39
» Juan Manuel Marquez, 40, is still duckin Prince Naseem Hamed, 40, just cos Naz, 40, is younger than Juan Manuel Marquez, 40. This is why Juan Manuel Marquez, 40, is fightin Mike Alvarado, 33, who's younger than Hamed, 40, in May n this is why
» Hamed, 38-Glen Johnson, 43, in May cos Naz, 38, is younger than Johnson, 43, n cos Johnson, 43, is still fightin
» Weigh in - Weakend Boxing - Garcia vs. Morales, Devon Alexander, Randall Bailey, Hassan N'Dam, Peter Quillin, Malignaggi, Pablo Cesar Cano, Brook, Saldivia
» Hamed, 39-Bernard Hopkins, 48, in May cos Naz, 39, is younger than Hopkins, 48, n cos Hopkins, 48, is still fightin (just beat Murat, 30, who is younger than Naz, 39
» Juan Manuel Marquez, 40, is still duckin Prince Naseem Hamed, 40, just cos Naz, 40, is younger than Juan Manuel Marquez, 40. This is why Juan Manuel Marquez, 40, is fightin Mike Alvarado, 33, who's younger than Hamed, 40, in May n this is why
» Hamed, 38-Glen Johnson, 43, in May cos Naz, 38, is younger than Johnson, 43, n cos Johnson, 43, is still fightin
» Weigh in - Weakend Boxing - Garcia vs. Morales, Devon Alexander, Randall Bailey, Hassan N'Dam, Peter Quillin, Malignaggi, Pablo Cesar Cano, Brook, Saldivia
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|