The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

+41
Gregers
Holymiky
Marky
guildfordbat
Born Slippy
Trebs
lfc91
1GrumpyGolfer
FootballLight
J.Benson II
JDizzle
Every Time Ref
TRUSSMAN66
Sand
sportform
Mat
Mad for Chelsea
Hammersmith harrier
Lumbering_Jack
Champagne_Socialist
hampo17
LastDamnation
The Special Juan
Crimey
The Fourth Lion
westisbest
nasisillmatic
Roller_Coaster
Duty281
CFCNick
compelling and rich
Bull
sodhat
Good Golly I'm Olly
GSC
mystiroakey
Fernando
NickisBHAFC
socal1976
Dolphin Ziggler
Ent
45 posters

Page 11 of 20 Previous  1 ... 7 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 15 ... 20  Next

Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Ent Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:45 pm

First topic message reminder :

Mancini was terrible, how I wish he was still there.

Should have walked the league the last 2 years with the squad he had and gotten out of his cl groups.

Ent

Posts : 7337
Join date : 2011-05-02

Back to top Go down


Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:39 am

Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:I can't be bothered discussing this any longer with someone who thinks we should have tried signed Holtby and Kallstrome. Utterly clueless.

Makes you wonder doesn't it.

United fans know we had an atrocious summer window and that we needed midfielders.

Losing to stoke now means we should have signed kallstrom and holtby.

Why not Adam for 30 million? After all he scores twice today...

The issue is that there are cm players better than cleverley, giggs, valencia, fletcher etc who you could have bought to improve your team rather than just not buying them at all. Kallstrom was a loan signing so would not have cost United anything so there is nothing to lose.

Who should we have bought, seriously?

Kallstrom isn't better than the majority of our players, he is a nothing player.

based on what?

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Ent Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:39 am

mystiroakey wrote:Ok lads- you say these CM's are worse than what you have already.

So tell me how you lose to stoke when you have 3 world class players in attack! and better players in every other position..

Is this all on Moyes tactics, moral,  etc

what is the problem?


We are crap, I say this all the time. Moyes is doing a terrible job, I say this all the time.

We lost 2 centre halfs to injury today and there were lots of individual errors.

Everyone knows this season has been a shambles and we need quality signings.

What we don't need is to waste our limited budget on a pile of rubbish in a spurs style spending spree.

We've wasted enough on fellani.

Ent

Posts : 7337
Join date : 2011-05-02

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Duty281 Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:39 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
John wrote:problem is, as i've said before, you can't just play rvp, rooney, mata & januzaj for example at the same time and just hope to blow teams away. this league will open you open up & punish you if you've got weak areas & don't defend properly or have a weak core. United have that & it's plain for everyone to see. You can show off Mata as a signing, however, he wasn't actually needed. Yes, you can't ignore him & not buy him, that's foolish, but you've got to address the areas that need addressing before you go buying luxury players. Cleverley - unbelievably shocking.

Moyes can say whatever he wants about the summer, top 4 is looking slim now. you wont be able to attract the world class players & rooney wont sign. end off.

I agree, whilst mata is a great player he wasn't actually needed. Man U have a very weak central Midfield and very weak defence.

They should have bought a quality CM rather than mata.

You could say the same really about Ozil - Arsenal didn't really need a player in his position, they needed a striker more, or a better holding midfielder, or some back-up for their defence.

But they went and got Ozil, and you wouldn't complain at that would you?

Duty281

Posts : 32767
Join date : 2011-06-07
Age : 28
Location : I wouldn’t want to be faster or greener than now if you were with me; O you were the best of all my days

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Ent Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:40 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:I can't be bothered discussing this any longer with someone who thinks we should have tried signed Holtby and Kallstrome. Utterly clueless.

Makes you wonder doesn't it.

United fans know we had an atrocious summer window and that we needed midfielders.

Losing to stoke now means we should have signed kallstrom and holtby.

Why not Adam for 30 million? After all he scores twice today...

The issue is that there are cm players better than cleverley, giggs, valencia, fletcher etc who you could have bought to improve your team rather than just not buying them at all. Kallstrom was a loan signing so would not have cost United anything so there is nothing to lose.

Who should we have bought, seriously?

Kallstrom isn't better than the majority of our players, he is a nothing player.

based on what?

His career.

Ent

Posts : 7337
Join date : 2011-05-02

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:40 am

Ent apparently we should have signed Bender a player our midfield dominated for two whole games this season, somebody needs to get off football manager and enter the real world.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:41 am

Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:I can't be bothered discussing this any longer with someone who thinks we should have tried signed Holtby and Kallstrome. Utterly clueless.

Makes you wonder doesn't it.

United fans know we had an atrocious summer window and that we needed midfielders.

Losing to stoke now means we should have signed kallstrom and holtby.

Why not Adam for 30 million? After all he scores twice today...

The issue is that there are cm players better than cleverley, giggs, valencia, fletcher etc who you could have bought to improve your team rather than just not buying them at all. Kallstrom was a loan signing so would not have cost United anything so there is nothing to lose.

Who should we have bought, seriously?

Kallstrom isn't better than the majority of our players, he is a nothing player.

based on what?

His career.

expand on that, what about his career hs made him a nothing player?

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:41 am

Ent wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Ok lads- you say these CM's are worse than what you have already.

So tell me how you lose to stoke when you have 3 world class players in attack! and better players in every other position..

Is this all on Moyes tactics, moral,  etc

what is the problem?


We are crap, I say this all the time. Moyes is doing a terrible job, I say this all the time.

We lost 2 centre halfs to injury today and there were lots of individual errors.

Everyone knows this season has been a shambles and we need quality signings.

What we don't need is to waste our limited budget on a pile of rubbish in a spurs style spending spree.

We've wasted enough on fellani.

Spot on we need world class quality not somebody who's marginally better than what we currently have.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by mystiroakey Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:42 am

Now look i know that a players worth isn't really relative when it comes to what one gives a team...
But palace beat stoke pretty well the other day..

Palaces total SQUAD worth wasnt even worth the one player United just bought in Mata at 37 odd mill!

That is the reality of it.

Is football Insane. yes it is..

Moyes is going to look stupider and stupider as time goes on.

Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...

It is baffling lads.

Now yes we can say all this is a one off and occasionally good teams lose, and its rare that one player can make the impact in a game- Yes that's true, but if that was the case no one would be talking about how messed up it is at united. This isn't a one off is it..


mystiroakey

Posts : 32472
Join date : 2011-03-07
Age : 46
Location : surrey

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Ent Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:44 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:I can't be bothered discussing this any longer with someone who thinks we should have tried signed Holtby and Kallstrome. Utterly clueless.

Makes you wonder doesn't it.

United fans know we had an atrocious summer window and that we needed midfielders.

Losing to stoke now means we should have signed kallstrom and holtby.

Why not Adam for 30 million? After all he scores twice today...

The issue is that there are cm players better than cleverley, giggs, valencia, fletcher etc who you could have bought to improve your team rather than just not buying them at all. Kallstrom was a loan signing so would not have cost United anything so there is nothing to lose.

Who should we have bought, seriously?

Kallstrom isn't better than the majority of our players, he is a nothing player.

The players I mentioned above. Cabaye for 19 million. Kopke for about 30 mil, laes bendner for about 30 mil.

A lo of players and they don't need to be 25 to sign them. VP was approoaching 30 when you signed him and he won you the EPL last year.

Hampo has stated there are many 25/26 year old available players costing 15 million who would improve out side.

I asked for examples.

Atletico Madrid are level with barca with a game in hand in la liga. They are going well in the cl. Koke isn't available in January.

Bender isn't available as Dortmund barely have a fit player.

This isn't football manager.

Ent

Posts : 7337
Join date : 2011-05-02

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:47 am

Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:I can't be bothered discussing this any longer with someone who thinks we should have tried signed Holtby and Kallstrome. Utterly clueless.

Makes you wonder doesn't it.

United fans know we had an atrocious summer window and that we needed midfielders.

Losing to stoke now means we should have signed kallstrom and holtby.

Why not Adam for 30 million? After all he scores twice today...

The issue is that there are cm players better than cleverley, giggs, valencia, fletcher etc who you could have bought to improve your team rather than just not buying them at all. Kallstrom was a loan signing so would not have cost United anything so there is nothing to lose.

Who should we have bought, seriously?

Kallstrom isn't better than the majority of our players, he is a nothing player.

The players I mentioned above. Cabaye for 19 million. Kopke for about 30 mil, laes bendner for about 30 mil.

A lo of players and they don't need to be 25 to sign them. VP was approoaching 30 when you signed him and he won you the EPL last year.

Hampo has stated there are many 25/26 year old available players costing 15 million who would improve out side.

I asked for examples.

Atletico Madrid are level with barca with a game in hand in la liga. They are going well in the cl. Koke isn't available in January.

Bender isn't available as Dortmund barely have a fit player.

This isn't football manager.

you don't know if they are available as you never bidded for them. But keep feeling sorry for yourself by saying no one was available that's why you are left with garbage players in CM.

If you can't sign anyone now think how hard it will be in july if you have no CL footbll to offer.

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Ent Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:48 am

mystiroakey wrote:Now look i know that a players worth isn't really relative when it comes to what one gives a team...
But palace beat stoke pretty well the other day..

Palaces total SQUAD worth wasnt even worth the one player United just bought in Mata at 37 odd mill!

That is the reality of it.

Is football Insane. yes it is..

Moyes is going to look stupider and stupider as time goes on.

Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...

It is baffling lads.

Now yes we can say all  this is a one off and occasionally good teams lose, and its rare that one player can make the impact in a game- Yes that's true, but if that was the case no one would be talking about how messed up it is at united. This isn't a one off is it..


Again both our centre halfs went off injured, limiting our response and making us have to put in a barely fit carrick into central defense.

We made individual errors

It was terrible and is a catastrophe for our season.

We need players, but spending loads on crap isn't the answer.

Ent

Posts : 7337
Join date : 2011-05-02

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:49 am

Ent wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Now look i know that a players worth isn't really relative when it comes to what one gives a team...
But palace beat stoke pretty well the other day..

Palaces total SQUAD worth wasnt even worth the one player United just bought in Mata at 37 odd mill!

That is the reality of it.

Is football Insane. yes it is..

Moyes is going to look stupider and stupider as time goes on.

Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...

It is baffling lads.

Now yes we can say all  this is a one off and occasionally good teams lose, and its rare that one player can make the impact in a game- Yes that's true, but if that was the case no one would be talking about how messed up it is at united. This isn't a one off is it..


Again both our centre halfs went off injured, limiting our response and making us have to put in a barely fit carrick into central defense.

We made individual errors

It was terrible and is a catastrophe for our season.

We need players, but spending loads on crap isn't the answer.


kallstrom was a loan signing so would have cost you nothing......

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:51 am

Today was one of the first times we lost a game we didn't deserve to lose, Welbeck was awful the whole time he was on the pitch, if his touch hadn't deserted him numerous times we could have had a handful. Both of their goals were fortunate, big deflection for the first and a complete mishit sat up perfectly for the second. Mata for what it's worth player pretty well and was creating countless opportunities.

Losing both Evans and Jones meant Moyes had one game changing sub to make which he had to delay because of an eye injury to Cleverly, he was not at fault at all today.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Duty281 Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:51 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Now look i know that a players worth isn't really relative when it comes to what one gives a team...
But palace beat stoke pretty well the other day..

Palaces total SQUAD worth wasnt even worth the one player United just bought in Mata at 37 odd mill!

That is the reality of it.

Is football Insane. yes it is..

Moyes is going to look stupider and stupider as time goes on.

Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...

It is baffling lads.

Now yes we can say all  this is a one off and occasionally good teams lose, and its rare that one player can make the impact in a game- Yes that's true, but if that was the case no one would be talking about how messed up it is at united. This isn't a one off is it..


Again both our centre halfs went off injured, limiting our response and making us have to put in a barely fit carrick into central defense.

We made individual errors

It was terrible and is a catastrophe for our season.

We need players, but spending loads on crap isn't the answer.


kallstrom was a loan signing so would have cost you nothing......

Wages?

He wouldn't have exactly been a step forward either.

Duty281

Posts : 32767
Join date : 2011-06-07
Age : 28
Location : I wouldn’t want to be faster or greener than now if you were with me; O you were the best of all my days

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:53 am

Loan signings cost money most of the time unless your loaning a youngster gaining first time experience. Between the loan fee and his wages Kallstrom would cost about £2mil I would guess, the same amount Cardiff are buying for Zaha.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by mystiroakey Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:55 am

come on Ent you could have loaned out another 5 players easily to pay for his money * 5!!

mystiroakey

Posts : 32472
Join date : 2011-03-07
Age : 46
Location : surrey

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:56 am

Would we have signed a player with a back injury anyway? I severely doubt that Mysti.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:57 am

Duty281 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Now look i know that a players worth isn't really relative when it comes to what one gives a team...
But palace beat stoke pretty well the other day..

Palaces total SQUAD worth wasnt even worth the one player United just bought in Mata at 37 odd mill!

That is the reality of it.

Is football Insane. yes it is..

Moyes is going to look stupider and stupider as time goes on.

Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...

It is baffling lads.

Now yes we can say all  this is a one off and occasionally good teams lose, and its rare that one player can make the impact in a game- Yes that's true, but if that was the case no one would be talking about how messed up it is at united. This isn't a one off is it..


Again both our centre halfs went off injured, limiting our response and making us have to put in a barely fit carrick into central defense.

We made individual errors

It was terrible and is a catastrophe for our season.

We need players, but spending loads on crap isn't the answer.


kallstrom was a loan signing so would have cost you nothing......

Wages?

He wouldn't have exactly been a step forward either.

a player with 106 caps who has played at 3 european championships and 1 world cup...... I know you haven't seen his career and you may try and deny that but it is obvious you hven't seen him play.

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:00 am

You're not exactly proving you've seen him play either, jumping on Wiki and finding a couple of stats doesn't say anything of his ability. I've never seen him perform well against England and he's had enough opportunities and he was overshadowed for much of his Lyon career by Juninho.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Duty281 Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:03 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Duty281 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Now look i know that a players worth isn't really relative when it comes to what one gives a team...
But palace beat stoke pretty well the other day..

Palaces total SQUAD worth wasnt even worth the one player United just bought in Mata at 37 odd mill!

That is the reality of it.

Is football Insane. yes it is..

Moyes is going to look stupider and stupider as time goes on.

Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...

It is baffling lads.

Now yes we can say all  this is a one off and occasionally good teams lose, and its rare that one player can make the impact in a game- Yes that's true, but if that was the case no one would be talking about how messed up it is at united. This isn't a one off is it..


Again both our centre halfs went off injured, limiting our response and making us have to put in a barely fit carrick into central defense.

We made individual errors

It was terrible and is a catastrophe for our season.

We need players, but spending loads on crap isn't the answer.


kallstrom was a loan signing so would have cost you nothing......

Wages?

He wouldn't have exactly been a step forward either.

a player with 106 caps who has played at 3 european championships and 1 world cup...... I know you haven't seen his career and you may try and deny that but it is obvious you hven't seen him play.

Seen him play a few times. A 31-year-old with some vast experience is not what a title-chasing team need (in the case of Arsenal), nor is it what a top-4 hopeful team need (in the case of United).

A mid-table team who need a bit of experience to haul them away from the abyss below? Sure.

Cant believe Arsenal got him though. My first thought was: Why? Oh and he could be out for three months, which would make the signing fairly redundant.

Duty281

Posts : 32767
Join date : 2011-06-07
Age : 28
Location : I wouldn’t want to be faster or greener than now if you were with me; O you were the best of all my days

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:07 am

Duty281 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Duty281 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Now look i know that a players worth isn't really relative when it comes to what one gives a team...
But palace beat stoke pretty well the other day..

Palaces total SQUAD worth wasnt even worth the one player United just bought in Mata at 37 odd mill!

That is the reality of it.

Is football Insane. yes it is..

Moyes is going to look stupider and stupider as time goes on.

Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...

It is baffling lads.

Now yes we can say all  this is a one off and occasionally good teams lose, and its rare that one player can make the impact in a game- Yes that's true, but if that was the case no one would be talking about how messed up it is at united. This isn't a one off is it..


Again both our centre halfs went off injured, limiting our response and making us have to put in a barely fit carrick into central defense.

We made individual errors

It was terrible and is a catastrophe for our season.

We need players, but spending loads on crap isn't the answer.


kallstrom was a loan signing so would have cost you nothing......

Wages?

He wouldn't have exactly been a step forward either.

a player with 106 caps who has played at 3 european championships and 1 world cup...... I know you haven't seen his career and you may try and deny that but it is obvious you hven't seen him play.

Seen him play a few times. A 31-year-old with some vast experience is not what a title-chasing team need (in the case of Arsenal), nor is it what a top-4 hopeful team need (in the case of United).

A mid-table team who need a bit of experience to haul them away from the abyss below? Sure.

Cant believe Arsenal got him though. My first thought was: Why?

I'm not complaining you are stuck with a useless cleverley, a crocked fletcher and a grandad Giggs whilst Arsenal have kallstrom Smile If you think he is useless based on you hardly ever seeing him play (probably you have seen him play about once for sweden) then that is your choice. I am happy Arsenal got him on a loan and look forward to seeing him play.

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by mystiroakey Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:08 am

Why is it when everyone mentions cabaye it gets ignored.

You lads know cabaye was your answer.. You just dont want to admit it

mystiroakey

Posts : 32472
Join date : 2011-03-07
Age : 46
Location : surrey

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:09 am

Duty, the child has again wrongfully thought you're a Man United fan, what a plonker.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:10 am

mystiroakey wrote:Why is it when everyone mentions cabaye it gets ignored.

You lads know cabaye was your answer.. You just dont want to admit it

He was the perfect fit, EPL experience, top quality player in CM. Shame they let him go.

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Duty281 Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:10 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Duty281 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Duty281 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Now look i know that a players worth isn't really relative when it comes to what one gives a team...
But palace beat stoke pretty well the other day..

Palaces total SQUAD worth wasnt even worth the one player United just bought in Mata at 37 odd mill!

That is the reality of it.

Is football Insane. yes it is..

Moyes is going to look stupider and stupider as time goes on.

Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...

It is baffling lads.

Now yes we can say all  this is a one off and occasionally good teams lose, and its rare that one player can make the impact in a game- Yes that's true, but if that was the case no one would be talking about how messed up it is at united. This isn't a one off is it..


Again both our centre halfs went off injured, limiting our response and making us have to put in a barely fit carrick into central defense.

We made individual errors

It was terrible and is a catastrophe for our season.

We need players, but spending loads on crap isn't the answer.


kallstrom was a loan signing so would have cost you nothing......

Wages?

He wouldn't have exactly been a step forward either.

a player with 106 caps who has played at 3 european championships and 1 world cup...... I know you haven't seen his career and you may try and deny that but it is obvious you hven't seen him play.

Seen him play a few times. A 31-year-old with some vast experience is not what a title-chasing team need (in the case of Arsenal), nor is it what a top-4 hopeful team need (in the case of United).

A mid-table team who need a bit of experience to haul them away from the abyss below? Sure.

Cant believe Arsenal got him though. My first thought was: Why?

I'm not complaining you are stuck with a useless cleverley, a crocked fletcher and a grandad Giggs whilst Arsenal have kallstrom :)If you think he is useless based on you hardly ever seeing him play (probably you have seen him play about once for sweden) then that is your choice. I am happy Arsenal got him on a loan and look forward to seeing him play.

You?  Headscratch

Awfully sorry, I don't support Manchester United.

Neither am I sure where I've said he's useless. He's a decent player, but that's about it. Oh, and he's (in your words) crocked.

He won't take Arsenal forward. And I don't think he'll play much this season. What Arsenal really needed was a striker - Bendtner is not good enough. Wenger didn't deliver.

Duty281

Posts : 32767
Join date : 2011-06-07
Age : 28
Location : I wouldn’t want to be faster or greener than now if you were with me; O you were the best of all my days

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:11 am

mystiroakey wrote:Why is it when everyone mentions cabaye it gets ignored.

You lads know cabaye was your answer.. You just dont want to admit it

Would never have happened that's why Mysti, as a Frenchmen he would have chosen a French team able to pay him more, he wasn't a viable option under those circumstances.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Duty281 Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:12 am

Hammersmith harrier wrote:Duty, the child has again wrongfully thought you're a Man United fan, what a plonker.

Laugh

The funny thing is, if United had got Kallstrom yesterday, then CS would have been saying exactly the same things as we're saying now. He's only defending him because he plays for Arsenal.

Duty281

Posts : 32767
Join date : 2011-06-07
Age : 28
Location : I wouldn’t want to be faster or greener than now if you were with me; O you were the best of all my days

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:14 am

Duty281 wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:Duty, the child has again wrongfully thought you're a Man United fan, what a plonker.

Laugh

The funny thing is, if United had got Kallstrom yesterday, then CS would have been saying exactly the same things as we're saying now. He's only defending him because he plays for Arsenal.

I only really listen to proper fans of clubs not the childish lot who haven't got a clue, i'm not stupid enough to defend every little thing my club does. Signing Fellaini was pointless and he's proving just as much, had he signed for Arsenal CS would have been saying what a world beater he is.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:14 am

Duty281 wrote:

Laugh

The funny thing is, if United had got Kallstrom yesterday, then CS would have been saying exactly the same things as we're saying now. He's only defending him because he plays for Arsenal.

nope, he is a CM which is what you need.

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by The Special Juan Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:14 am

Why do fans feel the need to have a go at other fans with regards to what signings their respective clubs have/haven't made?
The Special Juan
The Special Juan

Posts : 20900
Join date : 2011-02-14
Location : Twatt

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:14 am

This post was made by Hammersmith harrier who is currently on your ignore list

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Duty281 Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:15 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Duty281 wrote:

Laugh

The funny thing is, if United had got Kallstrom yesterday, then CS would have been saying exactly the same things as we're saying now. He's only defending him because he plays for Arsenal.

nope, he is a CM which is what you need.

Why do I need a central midfielder?

To mow the lawn?

Duty281

Posts : 32767
Join date : 2011-06-07
Age : 28
Location : I wouldn’t want to be faster or greener than now if you were with me; O you were the best of all my days

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by westisbest Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:15 am

Fkn Lambert 10 men behind the ball BS.

Right i'm out in the sauce.

westisbest

Posts : 7917
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Bournemouth

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:17 am

Is there any real need for the cretin to post the same thing every time I make a post?

Could the mods explain this to me because it just comes across as attention seeking.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Crimey Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:20 am

Just ignore him, he's been talked to.

Crimey
Admin
Admin

Posts : 16490
Join date : 2011-02-15
Age : 30
Location : Galgate

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Guest Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:23 am

Interesting last couple of hours of debate on here.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by mystiroakey Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:25 am

Hammersmith harrier wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Why is it when everyone mentions cabaye it gets ignored.

You lads know cabaye was your answer.. You just dont want to admit it

Would never have happened that's why Mysti, as a Frenchmen he would have chosen a French team able to pay him more, he wasn't a viable option under those circumstances.

But as you have reminded us you are United.. Everyone want's to go there Wink


mystiroakey

Posts : 32472
Join date : 2011-03-07
Age : 46
Location : surrey

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Guest Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:28 am

John wrote:Interesting last couple of hours of debate on here.

I blame Giroud.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:29 am

mystiroakey wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Why is it when everyone mentions cabaye it gets ignored.

You lads know cabaye was your answer.. You just dont want to admit it

Would never have happened that's why Mysti, as a Frenchmen he would have chosen a French team able to pay him more, he wasn't a viable option under those circumstances.

But as you have reminded us you are United.. Everyone want's to go there Wink


Within reason Mysti, if you were Cabaye who would you choose?

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Champagne_Socialist Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:30 am

mystiroakey wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Why is it when everyone mentions cabaye it gets ignored.

You lads know cabaye was your answer.. You just dont want to admit it

Would never have happened that's why Mysti, as a Frenchmen he would have chosen a French team able to pay him more, he wasn't a viable option under those circumstances.

But as you have reminded us you are United.. Everyone want's to go there Wink


hahaha

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by mystiroakey Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:33 am

Hammersmith harrier wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:Why is it when everyone mentions cabaye it gets ignored.

You lads know cabaye was your answer.. You just dont want to admit it

Would never have happened that's why Mysti, as a Frenchmen he would have chosen a French team able to pay him more, he wasn't a viable option under those circumstances.

But as you have reminded us you are United.. Everyone want's to go there Wink


Within reason Mysti, if you were Cabaye who would you choose?

honestly- united .. yeah honestly. I would be playing in the PL, i would be playing for a great club, with great players in a very good league.. Going to PSG is a huge risk in World cup year. Not guaranteed games for the short or long term, playing in a worse league(if i am playing), even If i do play I may get replaced by a 50m target in the summer.


He is french though and he will be paid more. BUt for me Its all about playing football- And if you go to united you may become a huge hit and make 180k a year in the states to wind down your playing days so you may end up better off anyway

mystiroakey

Posts : 32472
Join date : 2011-03-07
Age : 46
Location : surrey

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:36 am

For you and me it's about playing football but for Cabaye I can imagine money is a huge factor as well as returning to his home country.

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by 1GrumpyGolfer Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:37 am

socal1976 wrote:
Olly wrote:
socal1976 wrote:
mystiroakey wrote:A Gooner backing up Tottenham!!

Am I in Bizario world

I am no Spurs fan but I am getting sick an tired of Jose's bully boys and team Abu Dhabi getting officiated to the top of the standings.

What is it with yanks and conspiracies  picard 

I don't know what is with the english and their horrible referees? It is one of life's unanswerable questions.

You're kidding right? Blown calls in the NFL by half a dozen refs last season. How about the perfect game thrown out by a ludicrous call at first. Technology isn't the be all and end all.

1GrumpyGolfer

Posts : 3314
Join date : 2011-01-28
Location : Pennsylvania

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Guest Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:39 am

Pointless. United would never have offered £19m for a 28 year old, seeing as they barely offered, what was it, £14m originally for Baines at his age. If PSG come calling, you go there. He's finally being paid handsomely in his career, he can win multiple titles & cups to add to his CV & he's playing for PSG, therefore, he's going to the World Cup, regardless of how much game time he gets in all honesty.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by mystiroakey Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:40 am

John wrote:Pointless. United would never have offered £19m for a 28 year old, seeing as they barely offered, what was it, £14m originally for Baines at his age. If PSG come calling, you go there. He's finally being paid handsomely in his career, he can win multiple titles & cups to add to his CV & he's playing for PSG, therefore, he's going to the World Cup, regardless of how much game time he gets in all honesty.

if he doesnt start for PSG he wont start in the WC. Its that simple. He will probally go to the WC - but will he play.

We shall see

mystiroakey

Posts : 32472
Join date : 2011-03-07
Age : 46
Location : surrey

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Hammersmith harrier Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:42 am

There is also that John, is £19mil value for money for a 28 year old?

Hammersmith harrier

Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-27

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Ent Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:49 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
Ent wrote:
Hammersmith harrier wrote:I can't be bothered discussing this any longer with someone who thinks we should have tried signed Holtby and Kallstrome. Utterly clueless.

Makes you wonder doesn't it.

United fans know we had an atrocious summer window and that we needed midfielders.

Losing to stoke now means we should have signed kallstrom and holtby.

Why not Adam for 30 million? After all he scores twice today...

The issue is that there are cm players better than cleverley, giggs, valencia, fletcher etc who you could have bought to improve your team rather than just not buying them at all. Kallstrom was a loan signing so would not have cost United anything so there is nothing to lose.

Who should we have bought, seriously?

Kallstrom isn't better than the majority of our players, he is a nothing player.

The players I mentioned above. Cabaye for 19 million. Kopke for about 30 mil, laes bendner for about 30 mil.

A lo of players and they don't need to be 25 to sign them. VP was approoaching 30 when you signed him and he won you the EPL last year.

Hampo has stated there are many 25/26 year old available players costing 15 million who would improve out side.

I asked for examples.

Atletico Madrid are level with barca with a game in hand in la liga. They are going well in the cl. Koke isn't available in January.

Bender isn't available as Dortmund barely have a fit player.

This isn't football manager.

you don't know if they are available as you never bidded for them. But keep feeling sorry for yourself by saying no one was available that's why you are left with garbage players in CM.

If you can't sign anyone now think how hard it will be in july if you have no CL footbll to offer.

How do you know we didn't bid or make enquiries? We could be working towards the summer.

Teams generally don't want to sell big players, especially not on January.

We've just signed one of the best players in the league and went in for kroos, a top player.

You can hardly say we didn't try to improve in January.

Ent

Posts : 7337
Join date : 2011-05-02

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by GSC Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:52 am

Kallstroms obviously not a game changing transfer but Arsenal don't need a panic buy to save their season
GSC
GSC

Posts : 42855
Join date : 2011-03-29
Age : 32
Location : Leicester

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by The Special Juan Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:56 am

Hammersmith harrier wrote:There is also that John, is £19mil value for money for a 28 year old?

How much was RVP?
The Special Juan
The Special Juan

Posts : 20900
Join date : 2011-02-14
Location : Twatt

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Good Golly I'm Olly Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:57 am

mystiroakey wrote:


Cardiff were losing to a team better than stoke today in Norwich. They were getting battered(Much harder than what man united did to them midweek) An inexperienced Cardiff manager brought on Zaha that changed the game completely and they won the game...


Right a couple of things.
1. We are not better than Stoke, we're probably on a par with Fulham for worst side in the league.
2. We didn't batter them bar the first 5 minutes or so.
3. We gifted the goals on a plate to Cardiff, totally chucked it away. Zaha made a little difference, but he wasn't the reason Cardiff won that game. The reasons were pur inept management, shambplic defending and then Marshall who went all beast mode
Good Golly I'm Olly
Good Golly I'm Olly
Tractor Boy
Tractor Boy

Posts : 51038
Join date : 2011-09-19
Age : 28
Location : Chris Woakes's wardrobe

Back to top Go down

Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x' - Page 11 Empty Re: Barclays Premier League 13/14 Thread Part 'x'

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 11 of 20 Previous  1 ... 7 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 15 ... 20  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum