The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

+14
Champagne_Socialist
YDKSAB
Adam D
hazharrison
TopHat24/7
Lance
Lumbering_Jack
Rodney
Rowley
OasisBFC
paperbag_puncher
Seanusarrilius
mobilemaster8
TRUSSMAN66
18 posters

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:01 am

First topic message reminder :

Haye is a part time boxer that is 33 years old and prefers the acting profession to the noble art these days.....He is also a classless jerk If we are honest..........Not much mileage in a Haye victory!!  He has been found out at the highest level and the chances of fighting Vitali are slim and none because of his ego and the fact he thinks he's still a Superfighter....

He'll get 5 million for Fury but less than half for Vitali and it won't happen !!

However ingratiating or irritating Fury is to the fan.............He is  charismatic...unbeaten and with the future ahead of him...........Have no doubts fights could be made with either Klit brother or... he has the time to wait each of them out and as there is little talent about take over the Heavyweight title..No one better than these two out there..

Price is a non starter............Haye will always be sullied by toe-gate and his non-effort against Wlad....

Fury should he beat Haye has a real prospect of putting Britain on the map and ruling at least one alphabet title If not more !!!

Timing is everything.........and If I was British I'd be really pulling for Fury...

Could have the World and Haye at his feet............I hope so for one..


Last edited by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:02 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : ..)

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down


Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by mobilemaster8 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:20 am

Is this why Winchester ain't on here? Has everyone foed him so that he is talking to himself? Haha!

mobilemaster8

Posts : 4302
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 37
Location : Stoke on Trent

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:21 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Guest Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:21 am

Wish people to stick to serious debate instead of resorting to petty mud slinging and arguing.

Classless oafs the lot of ya!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Rowley Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:23 am

DAVE667 wrote:ROWLEY is forever praising Wlad for his willingness to take on his mandatories.
Does this mean you now hold me in the same esteem as SLAYER Dave?

Rowley
Admin
Admin

Posts : 22053
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 51
Location : I'm just a symptom of the modern decay that's gnawing at the heart of this country.

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:23 am

DAVE667 wrote:Wish people to stick to serious debate instead of resorting to petty mud slinging and arguing.

Classless oafs the lot of ya!
I'd love too..even about bradley pryce..

This guy is obsessed..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by mobilemaster8 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:24 am

Calm down Dave. Your such an Oaf.

No seriously, where is Winchester?

mobilemaster8

Posts : 4302
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 37
Location : Stoke on Trent

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TopHat24/7 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:25 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.

Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:25 am

I'm starting to miss him ...Mate.

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:25 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time.  You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.

Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
Just f**k off

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TopHat24/7 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:27 am

laughing laughing laughing 

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:28 am

Is someone going to do something about this T**T or what..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Guest Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:28 am

Rowley wrote:
DAVE667 wrote:ROWLEY is forever praising Wlad for his willingness to take on his mandatories.
Does this mean you now hold me in the same esteem as SLAYER Dave?
It may seem that way but the truth is, I'm simply unwilling to risk your moderator wrath by witing SLAYER in 72 point typeface.....but if I could I would.

I may compromise and refer to you as RoWLeY therefore affording you something approaching the respect you deserve to fail to receive from this bunch of miscreants whilst not putting you on a par with SLAYER.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Lance Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:28 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time.  You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.

Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
don't you have something better to do?

Lance

Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-30

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Guest Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:30 am

Can we please get a "Meltdown alert" smiley for TRuSS? (See RoWLeY, this could work)

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TopHat24/7 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:30 am

Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time.  You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.

Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
don't you have something better to do?
like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years?? laughing

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:30 am

How sad is he..Lance ??

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Champagne_Socialist Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:31 am

If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TopHat24/7 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:31 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:33 am

OasisBFC wrote:did you all see haye's message to fury? https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SFKE3Yo-CwU

look how small he looks compared to the other 3. he looks like a super middle compared to those 3.

if you were looking as a non fan you'd expect them to crush haye with ease, it's crazy. it's also impressive that haye hits much harder than wach and towers. all about timing, speed and explosiveness.
He's certainly a throwback to the 80s mate

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:34 am

DAVE667 wrote:Haye stood up to Wlad's punches when nearly every man and his dog was betting that he'd go as soon as Wlad landed so why should Fury, a man with a fraction of the ability, be able to do any better?

Someone, not dissimilar to yourself, claimed that ring rust and inactivity could be the undoing of Mayweather and yet we've seen precious little of it over the years.

No, Haye doesn't have the natural ability that Mayweather has but let's face it, if we're being honest and all things being equal, Fury will only win if he gets a lucky shot in and, with a possible World title shot on the line and only a few fights left before he retires properly, I can't see Haye being sloppy enough to allow the big lad that opportunity.

Horses for course but I don't believe Fury should be representative of British HW boxing...we've had enough jokes/jokers in the past and he's simply the next clown in line. You talk about Haye being classless and yet you seem to find Fury endearing.

Strange world we live in eh?

Just a fanboy tribute this Dave......Fury keeps him at arms reach he has a chance.......Won't be luck that

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Champagne_Socialist Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:36 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??
I have a masters degree in law!!!!!

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:36 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Stick to shoulder pressing

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Lance Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:37 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:
Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time.  You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.

Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
don't you have something better to do?
like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years?? laughing
whats funnier...im biased to my favourite fighter who happens to be a friend of mine, or that you come on here in the middle of the day with nothing better to do than ...laugh at people....? just a little insecure I think

Lance

Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-30

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Guest Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:37 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
DAVE667 wrote:Haye stood up to Wlad's punches when nearly every man and his dog was betting that he'd go as soon as Wlad landed so why should Fury, a man with a fraction of the ability, be able to do any better?

Someone, not dissimilar to yourself, claimed that ring rust and inactivity could be the undoing of Mayweather and yet we've seen precious little of it over the years.

No, Haye doesn't have the natural ability that Mayweather has but let's face it, if we're being honest and all things being equal, Fury will only win if he gets a lucky shot in and, with a possible World title shot on the line and only a few fights left before he retires properly, I can't see Haye being sloppy enough to allow the big lad that opportunity.

Horses for course but I don't believe Fury should be representative of British HW boxing...we've had enough jokes/jokers in the past and he's simply the next clown in line. You talk about Haye being classless and yet you seem to find Fury endearing.

Strange world we live in eh?
Just a fanboy tribute this Dave......Fury keeps him at arms reach he has a chance.......Won't be luck that
It will be as he's rarely used his jab to it's fullest potential and I simply can't seem him having made the necessary improvements in a few short weeks.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Champagne_Socialist Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:37 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Stick to shoulder pressing
I just want everyone to be friends Sad

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:38 am

Surely he knows thats the only way he can win..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Guest Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:39 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Stick to shoulder pressing
I just want everyone to be friends Sad
You're nothing but a wide eyed dreamer

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TopHat24/7 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:39 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??
I have a masters degree in law!!!!!
seriously doubt that, and you said before you'd only gone to bachelors level.

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TopHat24/7 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:40 am

Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time.  You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.

Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
don't you have something better to do?
like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years?? laughing
whats funnier...im biased to my favourite fighter who happens to be a friend of mine, or that you come on here in the middle of the day with nothing better to do than ...laugh at people....? just a little insecure I think
bored, not insecure.

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:41 am

DAVE667 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Stick to shoulder pressing
I just want everyone to be friends Sad
You're nothing but a wide eyed dreamer
Maybe but I dreamed Haye would bottle it against Wlad..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Champagne_Socialist Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:42 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??
I have a masters degree in law!!!!!
seriously doubt that, and you said before you'd only gone to bachelors level.
I completed the LPC (Legal Practice Course) and an LLM (masters) in Housing law.

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:43 am

Don't encourage him CS... keep it on topic..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Strongback Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:43 am

Who would want Haye to win the guy's a tosspot?

When Haye stated boxing the first exercise Adam Booth taught him was auto-fellatio.


Last edited by Strongback on Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:45 am; edited 1 time in total

Strongback

Posts : 6529
Join date : 2011-07-02
Location : Matchroom Sports Head Office

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Lance Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:44 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:
Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time.  You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.

Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
don't you have something better to do?
like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years?? laughing
whats funnier...im biased to my favourite fighter who happens to be a friend of mine, or that you come on here in the middle of the day with nothing better to do than ...laugh at people....? just a little insecure I think
bored, not insecure.
hit a nerve there did I! some people be nice when they are bored, some people resort to infantile attempts at bullying and mocking others in order to try and justify their low self esteem. I hope it makes you feel better whatever your problems are

Lance

Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-30

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Champagne_Socialist Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:44 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??
I have a masters degree in law!!!!!
seriously doubt that, and you said before you'd only gone to bachelors level.
I completed the LPC (Legal Practice Course) and an LLM (masters) in Housing law.
had to complete a 15,000 word dissertation on whether the Localism Act had given local authorities more power in managing their social housing stock and what changes to social housing the Act would create.

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TopHat24/7 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:45 am

Champagne_Socialist wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??
I have a masters degree in law!!!!!
seriously doubt that, and you said before you'd only gone to bachelors level.
I completed the LPC (Legal Practice Course) and an LLM (masters) in Housing law.
Baffling....

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Champagne_Socialist Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:45 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Don't encourage him CS... keep it on topic..
sorry you are right I won't post anymore off topic posts.

Champagne_Socialist

Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:46 am

Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Lance wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.

So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a joke

I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time.  You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.

Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
don't you have something better to do?
like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years?? laughing
whats funnier...im biased to my favourite fighter who happens to be a friend of mine, or that you come on here in the middle of the day with nothing better to do than ...laugh at people....? just a little insecure I think
bored, not insecure.
hit a nerve there did I! some people be nice when they are bored, some people resort to infantile attempts at bullying and mocking others in order to try and justify their low self esteem. I hope it makes you feel better whatever your problems are
Whilst I agree with every word..Lance.......I think people know what this guy is about and lets get it back to Fury.......

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Lance Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:49 am

heres one...I really think Fury has a solid chin. granted hes been on his backside a couple of times, but that was more to do with overconfidence and balancing himself incorrectly. he didn't look at all hurt either time. Im not sure its gonna be as easy for Haye to hurt Fury as some people seem to believe. and Haye will not be taking chances, he hasn't for a long time, not even against Audley. this fight will not be over quickly

Lance

Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-30

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by hampo17 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:51 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:DAVe you watched a different fight to me...He had a t-shirt with both their heads in his hands and then ran like a thief...

I don't know how anybody could dislike Tyson..........Just a lovable clown for me.......

I imagine If you met them in the street..Fury would take the pee but still stand for a photo or give an autograph etc etc If that is what you desired..

Haye would be too busy I reckon..
This is the same Haye that opens his gym once a month to the fans and spends the day there?

hampo17
Admin
Admin

Posts : 9108
Join date : 2011-02-25
Age : 36

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:51 am

I agree Mate........Haye didn't engage much with the bigger Valuev or Wlad..........

My guess is he finds size intimidating just like the rest of us..

Hopefully Fury has been getting a jab sorted out over the last two months.

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Guest Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:52 am

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Surely he knows thats the only way he can win..
I'm sure he does know it but there's the big difference being knowing it and being able to put it into practice.


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TopHat24/7 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:52 am

good recovery, poor chin. watched the Cunnigham fight again the other day, and a clip of the other kd, and way to much is being made of things like 'balance' and 'square on'. He was clocked and dropped, simple as that. Wasn't like he tripped over feet and was hit when already on his way down or clipped as he back peddaled.

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Lance Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:52 am

hampo171 wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:DAVe you watched a different fight to me...He had a t-shirt with both their heads in his hands and then ran like a thief...

I don't know how anybody could dislike Tyson..........Just a lovable clown for me.......

I imagine If you met them in the street..Fury would take the pee but still stand for a photo or give an autograph etc etc If that is what you desired..

Haye would be too busy I reckon..
This is the same Haye that opens his gym once a month to the fans and spends the day there?
Haye is a nice bloke. hes just a businessman and a celebrity before a boxer these days

Lance

Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-30

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:53 am

His 16 month layoff may tell too.............

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Guest Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:55 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:good recovery, poor chin.  watched the Cunnigham fight again the other day, and a clip of the other kd, and way to much is being made of things like 'balance' and 'square on'.  He was clocked and dropped, simple as that.  Wasn't like he tripped over feet and was hit when already on his way down or clipped as he back peddaled.
Haye can put him over and can keep him down however, he doesn't have to keep him down. Fury goes over a couple of times in one round and it won't take much for the ref to wave it off. Maybe instead of the jab, Fury should be working on his balance....especially given he only ever gets floored when he's off balance Whistle 

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:57 am

Not much chance of Haye being genuinely floored off Wlad was there....

Never in punching range

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Lance Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:57 am

TopHat24/7 wrote:good recovery, poor chin.  watched the Cunnigham fight again the other day, and a clip of the other kd, and way to much is being made of things like 'balance' and 'square on'.  He was clocked and dropped, simple as that.  Wasn't like he tripped over feet and was hit when already on his way down or clipped as he back peddaled.
maybe, but it depends how you define chin I guess. recovery is part of it as far as im concerned. I think its gonna be pretty tough for Haye to stop him. At least as tough as it was against Chisora. not saying he cant do it because if Fury opens up to him enough Haye will do it. But I don't think he will KO him from pot shotting. I think Haye is preparing for a long fight and that we will see him try and get some rounds in the bank

Lance

Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-30

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by YDKSAB Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:03 am

Fury got NO CHANCE. Haye is PLAYING you people ONCE AGAIN! BUM fight for Haye to get rich off fools who DKSAB. Harrison, Chisora, Fury are BUMS. Haye picks these fights to HUSTLE. Fury got NOTHING but a BIG MOUTH.

YDKSAB

Posts : 131
Join date : 2013-05-21

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:06 am

YDKSAB wrote:Fury got NO CHANCE. Haye is PLAYING you people ONCE AGAIN! BUM fight for Haye to get rich off fools who DKSAB. Harrison, Chisora, Fury are BUMS. Haye picks these fights to HUSTLE. Fury got NOTHING but a BIG MOUTH.
Be interesting when you're kicked off and your IP address goes......Which other regular poster goes too.

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40552
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ??? - Page 2 Empty Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum