Anyone think the Great Britain football team is better than England?

Many of these younger talents look like they should have been in the England team. We should have ousted alot of the overpaid old guard years ago and focussed on the hungrier younger players.

I would like to see GB remain as a team for International competitions with the collective nations playing individually outside of that for friendlies, touring and possibly a Home Nations tournament. Anyone else agree?

I think they only look better because they're in a lower standard of competition. I'd always fancy the England side that appeared at Euro 2012 to beat them 9 times out 10.

Pointless comparison as the GB lads are playing fellas who are novices a lot of the time, of the teams they have played so far there weren't many incredibly good players in the opposition teams. U-23 like and all that, they are getting better but won't win the thing in my opinion.

No. Not even close. About the easiest sporting question I've ever answered.

Next.

Nope.

Though I wouldn't mind having Bellamy in the England squad.

No.
If the GB team had competed in Euro 2012, they would have lost all 3 group games.

Of course the GB team are better! It includes several Welsh players