Frampton quigg undercard...does it get any worse?

Ok I can understand that this fight was going to be PPV. And yes I will be buying it for the main event. But would it really kill Hearn to put on a half decent undercard? His stable is more than big enough. Of the first two fights announced I've only heard of Charlie Edwards and I think even he is a 6 fight novice. In retrospect, Joshua v whyte turned out to be a good PPV by comparison.

Is Hearn trying to turn fans away from boxing?

The main event sells the PPV itself....

No need to waste good fights for the undercard....

Save them for a so/so PPV....

It's bullcrap but that's the way these guys think..

McCullough vs Lowe is a great little scrap!

Ronikara wrote:Ok I can understand that this fight was going to be PPV. And yes I will be buying it for the main event. But would it really kill Hearn to put on a half decent undercard? His stable is more than big enough. Of the first two fights announced I've only heard of Charlie Edwards and I think even he is a 6 fight novice. In retrospect, Joshua v whyte turned out to be a good PPV by comparison.

Is Hearn trying to turn fans away from boxing?

before Froch v Groves II hearn was talking about two world title fights on the undercard, instead we got the usual matchroom fighter v TBA, usual turd from Hearn / matchroom

When Mayweather fought Canelo the undercard had Garcia v Matthyse, that fight didn't even need an undercard yet it had i think 2 or 3 world title fights as well as the main event.

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:The main event sells the PPV itself....

No need to waste good fights for the undercard....

Save them for a so/so PPV....

It's bullcrap but that's the way these guys think..

Truss is right. Infuriating but true.

They're all greedy pigs!

To be fair, it's a joint promotion with Cyclone and the undercard pits together fighters from rival firms.

It will make for good craic inside the arena (for anyone who landed one of Charlie's golden tickets).