The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

+10
Lance
AdamT
Nico the gman
TRUSSMAN66
TopHat24/7
wheelchair1991
Valero's Conscience
BoxingFan88
Herman Jaeger
RanjitPatel
14 posters

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by RanjitPatel Sun 04 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm

Haven't seen this mentioned so far but Matthysse was stopped in the 10th after looking a bit bemused by Postol's jab and movement up to that point but also being in the fight.

It also looked like he could have gone on.

Postol V Crawford next hopefully.

What's next for Lucas Matthysse?


RanjitPatel

Posts : 692
Join date : 2013-02-26

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Sun 04 Oct 2015, 12:57 pm

Maybe Provodnikov did more damage than we realised, or maybe it was an accumulation thing after a series of tough exciting fights. Maybe his style wasn't suited to longevity but I think he can come again. Although he should try to avoid the boxers with elite level skill.

Haven't seen it, but read he caught a headbutt and the punch that finished him was on the same spot as the headbutt. Maybe concussion?

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Sun 04 Oct 2015, 1:32 pm

I mean you boy Danny Garcia relinquished instead he fights Malignaggi and now wants a Thurman-battered Guerrero. Instead of rematching Matthysse and fighting Postol ffs! And he wonders why people call him a cherrypicker.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by BoxingFan88 Sun 04 Oct 2015, 2:30 pm

Impressive I got it totally wrong

I haven't seen it yet but people say he shut down mattheysse by clinching and keeping it long

Roach is a freaking genius

BoxingFan88

Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Valero's Conscience Sun 04 Oct 2015, 4:13 pm

Yeah saw this and surprised albeit I didn't know anything about Postol.

Mattysse said he could continue but felt a pop in his eye!

I love watching Mattysse but is definitely beatable against a skilled fighter with a good game plan and Roach is good at that.

Valero's Conscience

Posts : 2096
Join date : 2011-02-21
Age : 38
Location : Kent/London

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by wheelchair1991 Sun 04 Oct 2015, 4:31 pm

Postol always had a chance as style wise he is all wrong for Matthysse but i still backed Lucas to win good for Postol i hope he goes on from here and doesnt become like Garcia

wheelchair1991

Posts : 2129
Join date : 2011-07-03
Age : 32
Location : Worcester

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TopHat24/7 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 10:16 am

Really want to see Postol-Garcia now. Also, if we're talking 140lbs, that twit Broner should be in the mix now too.

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by wheelchair1991 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 11:57 am

Broner won't be fighting Postol because of Uncle Bob and Al not playing nicely with each other, the same reason is also valid with Garcia and Postol

wheelchair1991

Posts : 2129
Join date : 2011-07-03
Age : 32
Location : Worcester

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TopHat24/7 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:02 pm

Pathetic.

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by wheelchair1991 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm

TopHat24/7 wrote:Pathetic.

What is?

wheelchair1991

Posts : 2129
Join date : 2011-07-03
Age : 32
Location : Worcester

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm

So fair do's, Garcia had a reason for not fighting Postol, but no excuses for not rematching Matthysse in my book.

Thing is with Garcia, if he'd go after Thurman or Porter, instead of Malignaggi and Guerrero, all would be forgiven.

But any mention of those two to his father and he instantly dismissed those fights for some reason. Maybe it's the father who's the cherrypicker and not Danny.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:19 pm

What is to forgive ??????????????????????????

He's beat Khan, Matty, Petersen, Holt......

Worry about forgiving guys like Quigg and Kell Brook..


Last edited by TRUSSMAN66 on Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:19 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : ..)

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:30 pm

What's to forgive you dunce?

Him and hid dad are making easy money at the expense of the fans who wanted to see a Matthysse rematch.

Malignaggi and Guerrero are irrelevant in the welterweight division at present, who the hell wants to see Garcia fight them instead of Matthysse, Thurman or Porter. Why was his dad so keen to dismiss fights with Keith or Shawn when the media were calling for Danny to face them. Those two were the natural progression for him. The other two are a step back. Easy money or conning the fans if you prefer.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:34 pm

Silly little boy calling people names...

I'll wait till a more knowledgeable poster wants to debate....It shouldn't be long.. Cool

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Nico the gman Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:What is to forgive ??????????????????????????

He's beat Khan, Matty, Petersen, Holt......

Worry about forgiving guys like Quigg and Kell Brook..
Spot on Truss, many on here didn't give him a cat in hell's chance of beating Matthysse, won by UD and dropped Matthysse in the 11th,also stopped Khan despite being outboxed early on, didn't cherry pick those two.

Nico the gman

Posts : 1753
Join date : 2011-09-21
Location : middlesbrough

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:42 pm

It's like Andre Ward, Nico..........Cleaned out a division and getting abused on here while the same retarded types salivate over Quigg beating Frampo's sloppy thirds in his 5th defence...

All a bit silly..


Last edited by TRUSSMAN66 on Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:43 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : ..)

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TopHat24/7 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:50 pm

wheelchair1991 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:Pathetic.

What is?

The boxing politics (not you mate!).

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TopHat24/7 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:What is to forgive ??????????????????????????

He's beat Khan, Matty, Petersen, Holt......

Worry about forgiving guys like Quigg and Kell Brook..

Holt? Bloody hell, shut the front door, we've an ATG on our hands here....... Rolling Eyes

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TopHat24/7 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:52 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:It's like Andre Ward, Nico..........Cleaned out a division and getting abused on here while the same retarded types salivate over Quigg beating Frampo's sloppy thirds in his 5th defence...

All a bit silly..

Did Garcia clean out a division??

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:53 pm

Media pressure forced him to take the Matthysse fight, he was all over the Khan fight for obvious reasons.

If you think Paulie and Guerrero are (a)relevant and (b)the natural progression and (c) harder fights than Thurman or Porter, then there's little point in debating.

Always said it and I'll say it again, his dad's a cherrypicker.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:58 pm

Everybody is a cherrypicker............ Rolling Eyes

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Nico the gman Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm

Herman Jaeger wrote:Media pressure forced him to take the Matthysse fight, he was all over the Khan fight for obvious reasons.

If you think Paulie and Guerrero are (a)relevant and (b)the natural progression and (c) harder fights than Thurman or Porter, then there's little point in debating.

Always said it and I'll say it again, his dad's a cherrypicker.
Doesn't matter who forced Garcia to take the fight against Mathysse, he won didn't he, out hit the big hitter.

Nico the gman

Posts : 1753
Join date : 2011-09-21
Location : middlesbrough

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm

Almost everybody picked Matty on here.............as they did when he fought Khan....

If he's a cherrypicker then he's a good value one compared to other fighters around..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:09 pm

As I suspected Truss, you failed to address any of the points.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:12 pm

Not points mate......Biased supposition !!.

Didn't see the need to address anything..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:17 pm

Yep...

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by AdamT Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:19 pm

He is no worse than Khan or Brook

AdamT

Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:23 pm

No he's a lot better....

I mean why does it matter why he fights Matty.... If he does...geez..

Barrel scraping..

I'm having Ali out of my heavy list....Because a little birdy told me he didn't fancy Frazier, Liston or Foreman

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:25 pm

No worse than Khan anyway, Adam.

Khan and Garcia the two cherrypickers at the axis for me.

Seen no evidence from Brook that he's at it, though I wish he'd let Brandon have his own gloves and waived the rematch clause. But that's another matter.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by AdamT Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:25 pm

Khan seems to get off way a lot of cherry picking. Guess because he is from here.

AdamT

Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:27 pm

Devon alexander is cherry picking..........

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by AdamT Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm

It is because Khan doesn't struggle with tht style of a fighter.

AdamT

Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:29 pm

AdamT wrote:It is because Khan doesn't struggle with tht style of a fighter.

You wouldn't have a long career If you always picked fighters you did struggle with........

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by AdamT Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:31 pm

Truss he has a habit of taking little risks these days. Khan is a brilliant 4 or 5 round boxer. That is the only compliment he gets from me.

AdamT

Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:33 pm

Garcia, Alexander, Maidana, Paulie, Algieri, Collazo, Judah, McCloskey..........

Doesn't look bad to me.

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TopHat24/7 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:33 pm

Herman Jaeger wrote:Yep...
clap

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:34 pm

TopHat24/7 wrote:
Herman Jaeger wrote:Yep...
clap

How pitiful is this guy..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm

AdamT wrote:It is because Khan doesn't struggle with tht style of a fighter.


At last, someone with a brain.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TopHat24/7 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:
Herman Jaeger wrote:Yep...
clap

How pitiful is this guy..

Yep...

TopHat24/7

Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:37 pm

Nico the gman wrote:
Herman Jaeger wrote:Media pressure forced him to take the Matthysse fight, he was all over the Khan fight for obvious reasons.

If you think Paulie and Guerrero are (a)relevant and (b)the natural progression and (c) harder fights than Thurman or Porter, then there's little point in debating.

Always said it and I'll say it again, his dad's a cherrypicker.
Doesn't matter who forced Garcia to take the fight against Mathysse, he won didn't he, out hit the big hitter.

When someone hates your Dad......You can't win whatever you do..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by AdamT Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm

Khan has cherry picked since Garcia. Also don't put McCloskey in there.

Paul made him look silly. Yes Khan was winning rounds, but he looked sh1t to be honest. Far from a p4p fighter.

Judah was a good win and Maidana was a great win.

I say it like it is. Alexander was a very good win, but that is the style Khan matches up well against.

He didn't look great against Chris in his last fight.

Anyway if he fights Manny I'm sticking a large sum on a Pacquiao ko.


AdamT

Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:41 pm

6 rounds to 0 and he made him look silly....

Stopped reading after that..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:43 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
Nico the gman wrote:
Herman Jaeger wrote:Media pressure forced him to take the Matthysse fight, he was all over the Khan fight for obvious reasons.

If you think Paulie and Guerrero are (a)relevant and (b)the natural progression and (c) harder fights than Thurman or Porter, then there's little point in debating.

Always said it and I'll say it again, his dad's a cherrypicker.
Doesn't matter who forced Garcia to take the fight against Mathysse, he won didn't he, out hit the big hitter.

When someone hates your Dad......You can't win whatever you do..


I think I find Danny more irritating than his pops to be honest. At least , and usually when he's not trying to be, his dad can occasionally be funny.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by AdamT Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:44 pm

He did, Khan landed very few. McCloskey was being defensive. If he had speed he would of landed on Amir.

Tell me one round were Amir dominated? Did you even watch the fight?

AdamT

Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:45 pm

60-54 x 3............

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Herman Jaeger Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:45 pm

You sticking a large sum Adam? I'm sticking my life savings.

Herman Jaeger

Posts : 3528
Join date : 2011-11-10

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by AdamT Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:46 pm

Ok mate, Khan looke sensational.

Put it this way. He is afraid to take any challeneges unless named Floyd or Manny for one reason. He is desperate for the huge pay day and a potential win against past it greats.

He is not a great fighter and he is going to get chinned soon.

AdamT

Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by AdamT Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:48 pm

Herman Jaeger wrote:You sticking a large sum Adam? I'm sticking my life savings.

Minute Manny starts throwing combos, the chicken dance will be on display. Manny didn't perform as badly as some would make you believe h=in his last fight.

He has more than enough in the tank to flatten Khan imo.

AdamT

Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:48 pm

He is afraid to take on anybody but the best....

60-54 isn't dominating...

I get ya..

TRUSSMAN66

Posts : 40529
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Lance Mon 05 Oct 2015, 1:51 pm

Garcia got to where he did the hard way. I was one of the few who expected him to beat Matthyse, but I didn't think he would beat Khan. Two great wins. No doubt he is cashing in his name and titles a bit since. Unfortunately most do.

But gotta agree with Truss. Brook one decent win...cashing in easy home defences since. Quigg no great wins but being kept busy cashing in his pretend title. Anyone who thinks Garcia is like these two is mistaken.

I actually think Matthyse is hugely overrated. Outboxed by Garcia, outboxed by Alexander, outboxed by Pistol. He's a hard man and great seek and destroy abilities, but he's never been top dog at LWW.That was wishful thinking by the guys who love GGG type fighters

Lance

Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-29

Back to top Go down

Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS Empty Re: Matthysse V Postol - SPOILERS

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum