Should Tyson rate favourably over Holy at HW?

First topic message reminder :

Always found this interesting when viewing fans and experts top HW lists, usually Tyson finds himself ranked favourably over Evander.

As a overall P4P we must rate Evander as a greater fighter than Mike, at HW it's difficult.

Holy has greater longevity, head to head wins over Mike and a greater signature win, in the wonderful recapture of his belts against Big Daddy Bowe. Add to the fact he dethroned a bloated for the want of a better word James Douglas, whom 8 months earlier dominated Tyson.

However Holy never had the consistency and dominance of Mike, one thing annoyed with Evander after usually a really terrific performance he never followed this up, the loss to Bowe and the one to Moorer comes more to mind.

(Bar Douglas )mutual opponents Tyson looked far more impressive against , Pinklon Thomas, Tilman, Alex Stewart and of course Tyson's demolition over Holmes.

So is it justified Tyson ranks favourably in most cases over Evander at HW, is the 4 years of dominance enough ?

Cheers and all the best for 2013

Rodders

I think that the draw Holyfield against Lewis gets mentioned a little too much. We all know it was only because of some shocking judging that he was gifted a draw