Nathan Hughes red card dismissed. Player free to play immediately

https://twitter.com/EmmaThurston23/status/586605016099749888

Chairman says they had access to evidence not available to the original disciplinary panel. Wonder what that could have been. Perhaps a better brand of biscuit.

Andy Goode says "shocking decision" cost Wasps in Europe.

https://twitter.com/AndyGoode10/status/586604847006359552

Alistair Eykyn calls this "a shambles"

https://twitter.com/alastaireykyn/status/586604940736520192

Well I didn't think he should of been banned. Glad its been overturned. But still think Toulon would have won

Correct decision in the end.

Correct decision -  but no  consolation for Wasps who were ahead in the game against Saints when we lost Nath & the following one in our biggest game of the season against Toulon.

Hughes not featuring against LW and Wasps have a rest next week, so it is still effectively a 3 week absence.

Eykin should have added farce to his description.

It will be interesting to see as stated above what the 'new evidence' is & in particular why that wasn't available for the original hearing.....

This whole scenario has been a total embarrassment for the sport I love.

carpet baboon wrote:Well I didn't think he should of been banned. Glad its been overturned. But still think Toulon would have won

I agree. However I am not sure Northampton would.