The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

The Covid-19 serious chat thread

+16
jimbopip
Soul Requiem
king_carlos
lostinwales
Luckless Pedestrian
hampo17
BamBam
Pr4wn
dummy_half
LordDowlais
navyblueshorts
WELL-PAST-IT
Samo
JuliusHMarx
Duty281
Dolphin Ziggler
20 posters

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Dolphin Ziggler Wed 24 Feb 2021, 9:37 pm

First topic message reminder :

Duty281 wrote:
Duty281 wrote:I will edit misinformation that I consider disrespectful and insulting. If you can’t respect that, they’ll be changed more firmly.

Such censorship is disappointing, but unsurprising given the often over-zealous moderating on here. Little wonder so many posters have drifted away when fair discussion is discouraged and alternative points of view are policed.

Over such a sensitive subject, and with people on here likely to have known people who have died, I stand by it on this issue and find your need to make a dig at the site disappointing.

Any further complaints can be directed to my inbox. Further comments will be moderated. Dangerous misinformation, especially presented as fact, will be moderated. If you feel your liberties unjustly compromised, go shout out a window or something.

Dolphin Ziggler
Dolphin
Dolphin

Posts : 24031
Join date : 2012-03-01
Age : 32
Location : Making the Kessel Run

Back to top Go down


The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Big Tue 20 Jul 2021, 11:20 am

I am completely with lostinwales - I can remember pubs/restaurants before the ban and have absolutely no regrets.  Crucially the difference between smoking and eating sugar is that if I sit in a pub and smoke, not only am I harming myself, but I am harming those around me.  And, potentially that includes those that have no choice not to be there (children with parents, staff who can't get a job elsewhere, etc).  If I sit and eat a donut it will have zero impact on those around me.

While I understand why Duty281 might see the smoking ban as a matter for individual establishments, that sounds to me like it's rooted in a philosophy that capitalism actually works effectively all the time.  There are lots of things capitalism does well, but sometimes it needs a nudge.  Back in the day I always thought it was complete madness that there weren't pubs/restaurants that banned smoking indoors (or even everywhere on the premises).  There were 13 pubs in my town and if 1 of them made that shift they'd have been unbelievably busy because so many of us would have gone there by default.  However, it seemed to be accepted wisdom in the industry that they couldn't survive if smokers were banned and as a result none dared to it.  The fact that it didn't happen naturally demonstrates to me exactly why sometimes it is good for the government to step in.

I'd agree that in other areas rules/regs go too far, but smoking I'm glad to see the back of.

Out of interest, Well-Past-It, does your view that the NHS not treat self-inflicted problems include getting injured playing rugby? One of the few sports that actuaries at insurance companies deem to result in more health risk than benefit.

Big

Posts : 668
Join date : 2011-08-18
Age : 40
Location : Durham

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Samo Tue 20 Jul 2021, 11:37 am

Its all well and good arguing for a free society were people can do as they please, but the problem is the capitalist system is rigged against us to get as much out of us as possible, often at the cost of our health. Fixed Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs) are probably the best example of this. Explicitly designed to get as much money from a punter as possible, with the possibility of staking as much as £100 every 20 seconds - before the pesky government stepped in and capped it at £2.

Samo

Posts : 5255
Join date : 2011-01-29

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Duty281 Tue 20 Jul 2021, 11:49 am

It's very simple actually - don't use Fixed Odds Betting Terminals and you won't lose money.

Never quite understood the hysteria about FOBTs, in all honesty. On smartphones - and indeed any device that connects to the Internet - you can stake far more at an online casino than you ever could on a FOBT, all without ever leaving the house, and at any time of the day or night.

Duty281

Posts : 25161
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 25
Location : Not having Chance on here

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Duty281 Tue 20 Jul 2021, 11:57 am

JuliusHMarx wrote:What do you mean by 'less able'? Do you mean restricted from exercising our common sense, or that our common sense is being eroded?

The latter. If the government provides needless and overarching regulation and taxation, then society will evolve to a position where common sense is less of a requirement and less practised, because society will believe that the government is responsible for a wider range of issues than it actually is. Then in a position where common sense is required society will be less able to use it. And in a time of government incompetence society is further hindered.

The solution is less government interference which will encourage individuals to take greater responsibility for their actions which will, eventually, lead to the betterment of society as a whole.

Duty281

Posts : 25161
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 25
Location : Not having Chance on here

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by JuliusHMarx Tue 20 Jul 2021, 12:15 pm

If we (people in general) let our common sense be eroded by government action, that just proves we didn't have much common sense in the first place.

JuliusHMarx
julius
julius

Posts : 20289
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Paisley Park

Big likes this post

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by jimbopip Tue 20 Jul 2021, 12:27 pm

I tuned in to this thread to see what today's revelations about the Fat Adulterer were stirring up....and lo and behold Duty 281 has sidetracked the discussion onto one about "Freedom Of Choice", that old right wing standby. Accidental?

Just to remind everyone; Cummings' latest kiss and tell says that everything we suspected about Johnson is probably true...and then some.

But hey, let's argue about Freedom Of Choice.

jimbopip

Posts : 5956
Join date : 2012-10-14
Location : sunny Essex

lostinwales likes this post

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Duty281 Tue 20 Jul 2021, 12:31 pm

jimbopip wrote:I tuned in to this thread to see what today's revelations about the Fat Adulterer were stirring up....and lo and behold Duty 281 has sidetracked the discussion onto one about "Freedom Of Choice", that old right wing standby. Accidental?

Just to remind everyone; Cummings' latest kiss and tell says that everything we suspected about Johnson is probably true...and then some.

But hey, let's argue about Freedom Of Choice.

If I were right-wing or supportive of this government or the Tory Party in general, you may have had a point here.

It's related to the discussion about 'Freedom Day' and the gradual lifting of restrictions.

I struggle to take much interest in the liar Dominic Cummings and what he says with his perpetual axe to grind. Of course, I am at least consistent in this point. Many people who thought Cummings was a liar around 13 months ago are now suddenly holding him up as a bastion of truth and honour because he's criticising Johnson.

Duty281

Posts : 25161
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 25
Location : Not having Chance on here

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by superflyweight Tue 20 Jul 2021, 12:48 pm

Duty281 wrote:
jimbopip wrote:I tuned in to this thread to see what today's revelations about the Fat Adulterer were stirring up....and lo and behold Duty 281 has sidetracked the discussion onto one about "Freedom Of Choice", that old right wing standby. Accidental?

Just to remind everyone; Cummings' latest kiss and tell says that everything we suspected about Johnson is probably true...and then some.

But hey, let's argue about Freedom Of Choice.

If I were right-wing or supportive of this government or the Tory Party in general, you may have had a point here.

It's related to the discussion about 'Freedom Day' and the gradual lifting of restrictions.

I struggle to take much interest in the liar Dominic Cummings and what he says with his perpetual axe to grind. Of course, I am at least consistent in this point. Many people who thought Cummings was a liar around 13 months ago are now suddenly holding him up as a bastion of truth and honour because he's criticising Johnson.

Oh Christ.  We're a maximum of two posts away from him telling us he's a libertarian.

superflyweight
Superfly
Superfly

Posts : 7508
Join date : 2011-01-26

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by WELL-PAST-IT Tue 20 Jul 2021, 1:16 pm

Big wrote:I am completely with lostinwales - I can remember pubs/restaurants before the ban and have absolutely no regrets.  Crucially the difference between smoking and eating sugar is that if I sit in a pub and smoke, not only am I harming myself, but I am harming those around me.  And, potentially that includes those that have no choice not to be there (children with parents, staff who can't get a job elsewhere, etc).  If I sit and eat a donut it will have zero impact on those around me.

While I understand why Duty281 might see the smoking ban as a matter for individual establishments, that sounds to me like it's rooted in a philosophy that capitalism actually works effectively all the time.  There are lots of things capitalism does well, but sometimes it needs a nudge.  Back in the day I always thought it was complete madness that there weren't pubs/restaurants that banned smoking indoors (or even everywhere on the premises).  There were 13 pubs in my town and if 1 of them made that shift they'd have been unbelievably busy because so many of us would have gone there by default.  However, it seemed to be accepted wisdom in the industry that they couldn't survive if smokers were banned and as a result none dared to it.  The fact that it didn't happen naturally demonstrates to me exactly why sometimes it is good for the government to step in.

I'd agree that in other areas rules/regs go too far, but smoking I'm glad to see the back of.

Out of interest, Well-Past-It, does your view that the NHS not treat self-inflicted problems include getting injured playing rugby?  One of the few sports that actuaries at insurance companies deem to result in more health risk than benefit.

Not quite, but if I were still a player and I repeatedly suffered concussions and my doctor recommended me to stop playing and I didn't, maybe. The point is if you carry on going against medical advice to stop or moderate your life style, you know what the likelihood will be and it becomes a conscious  decision to ignore the medical advice and you have accepted that likelihood, whatever it might be.

Breaking your leg playing rugby is not quite the same thing, I have not heard any doctors say that playing rugby will in all likelihood result and heart disease, cancer, or liver disease (although the rugby culture mat have such problems), nor I have I heard the BMA advise against playing rugby.
WELL-PAST-IT
WELL-PAST-IT

Posts : 3115
Join date : 2011-06-01

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Big Tue 20 Jul 2021, 1:20 pm

jimbopip wrote:I tuned in to this thread to see what today's revelations about the Fat Adulterer were stirring up....

It didn't stir up anything in me because there weren't any revelations. Everything I've heard is stuff that was kind of obvious a long time ago. I've known folks that worked with BoJo (and his brother) and in addition BoJo has regularly used his column inches to make his lack of competence and attitude to others very very clear. Nothing at this point is even remotely surprising. Even my Tory supporting friends think he has been a complete disaster on multiple fronts, and find the lack of integrity at the top alarming. Boris is riding high on the success of the vaccine right now, but once that wanes I suspect thinks will get a lot tougher for him, and honestly I'll be a little surprised if he survives until the next election (assuming no early election).

Big

Posts : 668
Join date : 2011-08-18
Age : 40
Location : Durham

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by lostinwales Tue 20 Jul 2021, 1:25 pm

And on the vaccination front I saw something saying that all of the EU will have caught up with the UK on vaccination numbers by the start of August. They got something right, but didn't manage to follow through, and also managed to blow any advantages it gave us.

Still they won't shut up about vaccination rates until they feel it no longer gives them kudos.

From the start the whole focus on presentation over content over the pandemic really has driven me nuts.

lostinwales
lostinwales
lostinwales

Posts : 10992
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Out of Wales :)

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by WELL-PAST-IT Tue 20 Jul 2021, 1:37 pm

Apart from buying the vaccines, have the Government actually done anything else with regard to the vaccination rollout. I thought that it was the NHS that were organising and controlling it?


Oh and taking the credit for it of course.
WELL-PAST-IT
WELL-PAST-IT

Posts : 3115
Join date : 2011-06-01

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by jimbopip Tue 20 Jul 2021, 2:13 pm

Duty281 wrote:
jimbopip wrote:I tuned in to this thread to see what today's revelations about the Fat Adulterer were stirring up....and lo and behold Duty 281 has sidetracked the discussion onto one about "Freedom Of Choice", that old right wing standby. Accidental?

Just to remind everyone; Cummings' latest kiss and tell says that everything we suspected about Johnson is probably true...and then some.

But hey, let's argue about Freedom Of Choice.

If I were right-wing or supportive of this government or the Tory Party in general, you may have had a point here.

It's related to the discussion about 'Freedom Day' and the gradual lifting of restrictions.

I struggle to take much interest in the liar Dominic Cummings and what he says with his perpetual axe to grind. Of course, I am at least consistent in this point. Many people who thought Cummings was a liar around 13 months ago are now suddenly holding him up as a bastion of truth and honour because he's criticising Johnson.

I don't think so. The way Johnson manages his cabinet reminds me of Elvis Presley and his Memphis Mafia: basically he surrounded himself with "good ole boys" who received a salary and lifestyle they could never have dreamt of, or ever achieved anywhere else, and all he demanded was complete uncritical loyalty, even when asked to behave illegally.  Look at the level of incompetence in the current Cabinet; look at the way they follow orders slavishly and never criticise even when they are defending a 180 degree volte face; John Whitingdale when challenged on the free school meals fiasco "I voted with the government....I voted with the government.", or Nadim Zahawi yesterday still trying to say Johnson and Sunak never intended to avoid self isolating. No, Cummings IS a liar and we all know that; the interesting thing is he knows he will never get another job with Johnson so is free to get his own back by spilling the beans. Contrast this with Matt Hancock who Johnson refused to sack but replied to his resignation letter by saying that he looked forward to working with him again in government in the future. Or as we stupid people say, "I didn't want to sack you. Keep shtum and I'll have you in a chauffeur driven car asap."

jimbopip

Posts : 5956
Join date : 2012-10-14
Location : sunny Essex

BamBam likes this post

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Duty281 Tue 20 Jul 2021, 2:37 pm

jimbopip wrote:
Duty281 wrote:
jimbopip wrote:I tuned in to this thread to see what today's revelations about the Fat Adulterer were stirring up....and lo and behold Duty 281 has sidetracked the discussion onto one about "Freedom Of Choice", that old right wing standby. Accidental?

Just to remind everyone; Cummings' latest kiss and tell says that everything we suspected about Johnson is probably true...and then some.

But hey, let's argue about Freedom Of Choice.

If I were right-wing or supportive of this government or the Tory Party in general, you may have had a point here.

It's related to the discussion about 'Freedom Day' and the gradual lifting of restrictions.

I struggle to take much interest in the liar Dominic Cummings and what he says with his perpetual axe to grind. Of course, I am at least consistent in this point. Many people who thought Cummings was a liar around 13 months ago are now suddenly holding him up as a bastion of truth and honour because he's criticising Johnson.

I don't think so. The way Johnson manages his cabinet reminds me of Elvis Presley and his Memphis Mafia: basically he surrounded himself with "good ole boys" who received a salary and lifestyle they could never have dreamt of, or ever achieved anywhere else, and all he demanded was complete uncritical loyalty, even when asked to behave illegally.  Look at the level of incompetence in the current Cabinet; look at the way they follow orders slavishly and never criticise even when they are defending a 180 degree volte face; John Whitingdale when challenged on the free school meals fiasco "I voted with the government....I voted with the government.", or Nadim Zahawi yesterday still trying to say Johnson and Sunak never intended to avoid self isolating. No, Cummings IS a liar and we all know that; the interesting thing is he knows he will never get another job with Johnson so is free to get his own back by spilling the beans. Contrast this with Matt Hancock who Johnson refused to sack but replied to his resignation letter by saying that he looked forward to working with him again in government in the future. Or as we stupid people say, "I didn't want to sack you. Keep shtum and I'll have you in a chauffeur driven car asap."

The way Johnson manages his cabinet is pretty much the same as how any PM in post WW2 history has managed their cabinet. He is not remotely unique in this aspect.

Cabinet following orders and rarely criticising the higher-ups - yes, that's a completely normal thing to happen. As a collective, cabinet wants to be seen as pulling in the same direction, they can't do this if they're seen to be bickering all the time (at least in public; they almost certainly do bicker in private). On an individual level, cabinet members wouldn't ordinarily like to criticise the PM because he is essentially their boss - promotions/demotions and such rely on him. This is how it has always been, it doesn't matter who the PM is.

I don't think Johnson has surrounded himself with people who receive a 'salary and lifestyle they could never have dream of' in return. Many of his cabinet have been in cabinet before, and will be in cabinet again when he's gone. Many of his advisors have been swilling around the top layers of government/the civil service for years and will continue to do so after Johnson departs.

We don't know if Cummings is 'spilling the beans' or not. He's a liar with an axe to grind. He may be talking a load of own pony. He may be telling the truth, but with his track record I doubt it.

Duty281

Posts : 25161
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 25
Location : Not having Chance on here

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by lostinwales Tue 20 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm

Its a question of which set of bullsh!tters you believe and when. If Cummings can corroborate his statements with actual evidence it makes it a little more believable than yet another nodding donkey.

Its also a question of degrees. PM's will want loyalty and will, or should, always be aware of who is going to stab them in the back. Few are as paranoid as Johnson, who seems to want to avoid any kind of scrutiny at all costs. This cabinet is remarkable in its lack of identity. It is true that a few might end up in cabinet posts in the future but that is going to be for the damning reason that there is a lack of viable options. Some of them, like Patel, should never have got another chance after the Israel debacle.

If you want to go to another extreme Blair's first cabinet was remarkable for the number of characters present, the different views and some real ability. I would point out that that 'colour' had largely disappeared by the end of his time as PM, but in the early days the future seemed so much brighter.

Strong leaders tolerate strong characters in their court. Johnson is not a strong leader.

lostinwales
lostinwales
lostinwales

Posts : 10992
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Out of Wales :)

jimbopip likes this post

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by jimbopip Tue 20 Jul 2021, 3:13 pm

lostinwales wrote:Its a question of which set of bullsh!tters you believe and when. If Cummings can corroborate his statements with actual evidence it makes it a little more believable than yet another nodding donkey.  

Its also a question of degrees. PM's will want loyalty and will, or should, always be aware of who is going to stab them in the back. Few are as paranoid as Johnson, who seems to want to avoid any kind of scrutiny at all costs. This cabinet is remarkable in its lack of identity. It is true that a few might end up in cabinet posts in the future but that is going to be for the damning reason that there is a lack of viable options. Some of them, like Patel, should never have got another chance after the Israel debacle.

If you want to go to another extreme Blair's first cabinet was remarkable for the number of characters present, the different views and some real ability. I would point out that that 'colour' had largely disappeared by the end of his time as PM, but in the early days the future seemed so much brighter.

Strong leaders tolerate strong characters in their court. Johnson is not a strong leader.

There are two things worth mentioning here: practically the first thing Johnson did as PM was withdraw the party whip from several established "Big Beasts" in the Tory party for voting against him thus ending their parliamentary careers,  followed swiftly by the Israel debacle with Patel which occurred simultaneously with Gavalar selling defence secrets,  both these breaches of ministerial conduct served to weaken May's standing within her party and with the public. Her subsequent resignation cleared the way for Johnson's leadership campaign. Did he connive with fellow cabinet ministers to topple her? Well none of Patel, Gove or Gavalar have won plaudits for their competence and almost any other PM would have sacked each them several times over yet Johnson has shielded them at all costs.

Oh, and Duty 281 even though I have an Honours Degree in Politics I am still really grateful to you for taking the time to explain the concept of Collective Responsibility In Cabinet to me. Much appreciated.

jimbopip

Posts : 5956
Join date : 2012-10-14
Location : sunny Essex

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Duty281 Tue 20 Jul 2021, 3:21 pm

lostinwales wrote:Its a question of which set of bullsh!tters you believe and when. If Cummings can corroborate his statements with actual evidence it makes it a little more believable than yet another nodding donkey.  

Its also a question of degrees. PM's will want loyalty and will, or should, always be aware of who is going to stab them in the back. Few are as paranoid as Johnson, who seems to want to avoid any kind of scrutiny at all costs. This cabinet is remarkable in its lack of identity. It is true that a few might end up in cabinet posts in the future but that is going to be for the damning reason that there is a lack of viable options. Some of them, like Patel, should never have got another chance after the Israel debacle.

If you want to go to another extreme Blair's first cabinet was remarkable for the number of characters present, the different views and some real ability. I would point out that that 'colour' had largely disappeared by the end of his time as PM, but in the early days the future seemed so much brighter.

Strong leaders tolerate strong characters in their court. Johnson is not a strong leader.

Yes, I agree if Cummings can get off Twitter and substantiate his tittle-tattle it may advance his cause.

You say strong leaders tolerate strong characters in their court - I'm unsure if they qualify as 'strong characters', but the ones who are most likely to betray Johnson to advance their own cause (Gove, Raab, Sunak) are all in his own cabinet. I agree that there's little ability in cabinet, but this is symptomatic of the (in my view) very low standard of MPs that currently exist - the Labour Party, currently, is even worse in this regard than the Tory Party.

Blair's first cabinet could have had whatever he fancied in it. He was untouchable for those first years in office. More chance of the Queen getting arrested than one of his fellow MPs trying to oust him. I agree that it had a range of different views contained within, but that was mainly down to the intriguing situation Labour was in at the time with its MPs being a mix of 'old' Labour and 'new' Labour and Blair trying to stitch it together.

Duty281

Posts : 25161
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 25
Location : Not having Chance on here

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Duty281 Tue 20 Jul 2021, 3:22 pm

jimbopip wrote:Oh, and Duty 281 even though I have an Honours Degree in Politics I am still really grateful to you for taking the time to explain the concept of Collective Responsibility In Cabinet to me. Much appreciated.

No problem. thumbsup

Duty281

Posts : 25161
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 25
Location : Not having Chance on here

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by lostinwales Tue 20 Jul 2021, 3:58 pm

Duty281 wrote:
lostinwales wrote:Its a question of which set of bullsh!tters you believe and when. If Cummings can corroborate his statements with actual evidence it makes it a little more believable than yet another nodding donkey.  

Its also a question of degrees. PM's will want loyalty and will, or should, always be aware of who is going to stab them in the back. Few are as paranoid as Johnson, who seems to want to avoid any kind of scrutiny at all costs. This cabinet is remarkable in its lack of identity. It is true that a few might end up in cabinet posts in the future but that is going to be for the damning reason that there is a lack of viable options. Some of them, like Patel, should never have got another chance after the Israel debacle.

If you want to go to another extreme Blair's first cabinet was remarkable for the number of characters present, the different views and some real ability. I would point out that that 'colour' had largely disappeared by the end of his time as PM, but in the early days the future seemed so much brighter.

Strong leaders tolerate strong characters in their court. Johnson is not a strong leader.

Yes, I agree if Cummings can get off Twitter and substantiate his tittle-tattle it may advance his cause.

You say strong leaders tolerate strong characters in their court - I'm unsure if they qualify as 'strong characters', but the ones who are most likely to betray Johnson to advance their own cause (Gove, Raab, Sunak) are all in his own cabinet. I agree that there's little ability in cabinet, but this is symptomatic of the (in my view) very low standard of MPs that currently exist - the Labour Party, currently, is even worse in this regard than the Tory Party.

Blair's first cabinet could have had whatever he fancied in it. He was untouchable for those first years in office. More chance of the Queen getting arrested than one of his fellow MPs trying to oust him. I agree that it had a range of different views contained within, but that was mainly down to the intriguing situation Labour was in at the time with its MPs being a mix of 'old' Labour and 'new' Labour and Blair trying to stitch it together.

Quite a shocking level of agreement. Interesting names. Gove and Sunak have ability. Raab comes across as an idiot. Gove has the ear of Murdoch (or the other way around) but everybody else hates him and whatever scandals exist around the breakup of his marriage to Vine must put future ambitions on hold. So that leaves you with Sunak. Outside of the cabinet you have Hunt who was defeated by Johnson last time but has been using his knowledge of the health portfolio to up his standing since then.

lostinwales
lostinwales
lostinwales

Posts : 10992
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Out of Wales :)

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by BamBam Tue 20 Jul 2021, 4:17 pm

Bojo got rid of those who he thought were a threat. Hunt lost his role in cabinet, he quickly got rid of Javid before his recent return.

Those who refused to bow at the altar of Brexit were also gone - Stewart, Gauke, Grieve etc were far more intelligent than most of the idiots we see rolled out to do the morning TV rounds. Every time I see the likes of Jenrick, Whately, Williamson, Dowden, Coffey etc representing the government I despair

BamBam

Posts : 16886
Join date : 2011-03-17
Age : 31

jimbopip likes this post

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by lostinwales Tue 20 Jul 2021, 5:07 pm

BamBam wrote:Bojo got rid of those who he thought were a threat. Hunt lost his role in cabinet, he quickly got rid of Javid before his recent return.

Those who refused to bow at the altar of Brexit were also gone - Stewart, Gauke, Grieve etc were far more intelligent than most of the idiots we see rolled out to do the morning TV rounds. Every time I see the likes of Jenrick, Whately, Williamson, Dowden, Coffey etc representing the government I despair

Coffey has a STEM PhD would you believe. A very rare beast in politics. Not a great deal of evidence it counts for much. The others are a depressing bunch. Whately seems vacant except for when there are expenses to be claimed. Williamson shouldn't be there and neither should Jenrick with his 'special' help for poor boroughs (or moderately wealthy boroughs that vote Conservative).

lostinwales
lostinwales
lostinwales

Posts : 10992
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Out of Wales :)

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Duty281 Tue 20 Jul 2021, 8:11 pm

Hunt wasn't removed by Johnson. After Johnson comfortably defeated him in the leadership election (66%-34%), Hunt was offered a cabinet role (defence) by Johnson but he turned it down and has been on the backbenches since.

Gauke and Grieve both political lightweights, hyped up to something more by those who opposed Brexit. I like Stewart, though I don't often agree with him, but he's unlikely to be leadership material and has since left politics of his own accord.

Duty281

Posts : 25161
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 25
Location : Not having Chance on here

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by BamBam Tue 20 Jul 2021, 8:30 pm

Well I sure am glad these political heavyweights in place now supported Brexit, where would we be without them Laugh

BamBam

Posts : 16886
Join date : 2011-03-17
Age : 31

Samo, Pr4wn, lostinwales and Big like this post

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Duty281 Wed 21 Jul 2021, 10:30 am

That Gauke and Grieve are both political lightweights does not preclude other Tory MPs from being lightweights. It's not a binary situation.

Duty281

Posts : 25161
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 25
Location : Not having Chance on here

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Big Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:17 am

To be fair to Bojo, he is a political heavyweight in the sense that he can get people voting for him and listening to what he says (like Gove, I guess it helps if you are a former journalist and your former employees are happy to give column inches to one of their own). However, that doesn't detract from the fact that he is not competent, regularly lies, and is a firm believer in helping out your mates/donors. A certain amount of charisma (even if it is a form of charisma that is utterly alien to me) can get you a fair way in politics. However, much like teflon-Tony before him, bulletproof-Boris will eventually find there is a limit to what you can get away with. It's no great surprise that Londoners, who had already had a few years to get bored of him, are much less likely to vote Conservative now.

Big

Posts : 668
Join date : 2011-08-18
Age : 40
Location : Durham

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by jimbopip Fri 23 Jul 2021, 9:33 am

I almost feel guilty about posting this comment since there seems no end to the opportunities this government gives us to castigate them for their incompetence; it almost feels like bayonetting the wounded after the shooting has stopped. Almost, but not quite. (Not Covid related but the totally surreal sight of Kwasi Karteng on Sky using the "It was all to complicated for a normal person to understand" excuse in relation to the NI Protocol screwup and when he said no-one could have foreseen how badly it would have turned out Kay Burley pointed out that THREE former PM's had warned that that was exactly how it would turn out, he then said "Yes but they couldn't guarantee that it would turn out like it did." What the absolute FECC!!

However, the Ping-self isolate fiasco....

When the Cabinet met and agreed to lift all Public Health restrictions and call it Freedom Day, and agreed that the inevitable rise in infections would be acceptable as it would only lead to a smallish number of hospitalisations and an even smaller number of deaths did no-one in the room say, "Yes but increased infections will lead to a huge increase in people being pinged! Shouldn't we have a contingency plan in place?"
What level of incompetence did it take not to foresee that? Or, like the NI Protocol foresee it but decide to carry on regardless?

jimbopip

Posts : 5956
Join date : 2012-10-14
Location : sunny Essex

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by lostinwales Fri 23 Jul 2021, 10:06 am

jimbopip wrote:I almost feel guilty about posting this comment since there seems no end to the opportunities this government gives us to castigate them for their incompetence; it almost feels like bayonetting the wounded after the shooting has stopped. Almost, but not quite. (Not Covid related but the totally surreal sight of Kwasi Karteng on Sky using the "It was all to complicated for a normal person to understand" excuse in relation to the NI Protocol screwup and when he said no-one could have foreseen how badly it would have turned out Kay Burley pointed out that THREE former PM's had warned that that was exactly how it would turn out, he then said "Yes but they couldn't guarantee that it would turn out like it did." What the absolute FECC!!

However, the Ping-self isolate fiasco....

When the Cabinet met and agreed to lift all Public Health restrictions and call it Freedom Day, and agreed that the inevitable rise in infections would be acceptable as it would only lead to a smallish number of hospitalisations and an even smaller number of deaths did no-one in the room say, "Yes but increased infections will lead to a huge increase in people being pinged! Shouldn't we have a contingency plan in place?"  
What level of incompetence did it take not to foresee that? Or, like the NI Protocol foresee it but decide to carry on regardless?

I know its all sweeping statements but Johnson appears to hate any kind of scrutiny. Having people question sh!t is obviously a good way of making it fit for purpose before unleashing it on the world, and he (and by extension his government) just don't do this. As a consequence they are always reacting to events that could (or were) predicted ahead of time.

lostinwales
lostinwales
lostinwales

Posts : 10992
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Out of Wales :)

jimbopip likes this post

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by jimbopip Fri 23 Jul 2021, 10:34 am

I always make sure my sh1t is fit for purpose before unleashing it on the world.

jimbopip

Posts : 5956
Join date : 2012-10-14
Location : sunny Essex

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by BamBam Fri 23 Jul 2021, 10:50 am

He’s probably loving being able to blame COVID for all the problems caused by Brexit. Pingdemic is a much better headline for him than Brexit goes tits up

BamBam

Posts : 16886
Join date : 2011-03-17
Age : 31

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by jimbopip Fri 23 Jul 2021, 11:06 am

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/government-accused-of-cover-up-after-ruling-out-search-of-matt-hancock-s-private-emails/ar-AAMtblY?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531

So ministers in PPE contacts scandal used private email accounts to discuss contracts BUT government refuses to allow scrutiny of those email accounts.

jimbopip

Posts : 5956
Join date : 2012-10-14
Location : sunny Essex

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by lostinwales Fri 23 Jul 2021, 11:22 am

jimbopip wrote:I always make sure my sh1t is fit for purpose before unleashing it on the world.

A balanced diet with lots of roughage is always important.

lostinwales
lostinwales
lostinwales

Posts : 10992
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Out of Wales :)

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by lostinwales Fri 23 Jul 2021, 11:25 am

BamBam wrote:He’s probably loving being able to blame COVID for all the problems caused by Brexit. Pingdemic is a much better headline for him than Brexit goes tits up

Stupid isn't it. Let's blame problems on the track and trace and not the virus. I saw a graph today showing hospital admissions vs infections for the last few months and the curve is the same shape. I strongly suspect that the proportion of admissions to infections is a long way down from where it was, but we are heading for very dangerous waters and the government's response is to close eyes, stick fingers in ears and start chanting la la la...

lostinwales
lostinwales
lostinwales

Posts : 10992
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Out of Wales :)

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Pr4wn Fri 23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm

I hate the word "pingdemic". It suggest that the app is the problem.

Pr4wn
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 5477
Join date : 2011-03-09
Location : Manila, Philippines

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by jimbopip Fri 23 Jul 2021, 12:40 pm

Reminds me of the time Johnson was visiting a school and one of the lids asked him what was the reason for the exams fiasco the previous year. The Fat Adulterer didn't even blink before saying, "A mutant algorithm!" As far as my mind can work out algorithms do not mutate, they simply carry out the task they were programmed to do. The teacher in me hates seeing anyone in any classroom anywhere telling kids porkies and passing it off as truth.

jimbopip

Posts : 5956
Join date : 2012-10-14
Location : sunny Essex

Back to top Go down

The Covid-19 serious chat thread - Page 4 Empty Re: The Covid-19 serious chat thread

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum